| ▲ | Retr0id 19 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Until your comment I didn't realise I'd also read it wrong (despite getting the gist of it). Attempted rephrase of the original sentence: Imagine history documentaries where they take an old photo, free objects from the background, and then move them round to give the illusion of parallax. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | necovek 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I'd suggest a different verb like "detach" or "unlink". | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nashashmi 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Free objects in the background. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tzot 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> Imagine history documentaries where they take an old photo, free objects from the background Even using commas, if you leave the ambiguous “free” I suggest you prefix “objects” with “the” or “any”. | |||||||||||||||||