| ▲ | iamnothere 3 days ago |
| This is one of the worst stories I’ve seen yet. It sounds like they were “all in” on Apple with zero backups, which shows some questionable judgment, but still, this sort of thing shouldn’t be possible any more than a bank deciding to take all your money with no recourse. (They can close your account, but they can’t keep your money.) Maybe hosts should be required to mail you a hard drive with your data on it when they close your account. Regardless, never assume cloud data is in safe hands. |
|
| ▲ | jbstack 3 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| > this sort of thing shouldn’t be possible any more than a bank deciding to take all your money with no recourse. (They can close your account, but they can’t keep your money.) I once had to help a relative sue a bank who had closed his account after he refused to answer their very intrusive questions (they wanted to know details about distant relatives living in another country). They also refused to return his money (tens of thousands) and refused to explain why. No amount of complaining or escalating made any difference, although we did manage to get a nice recording of an employee saying that he thought the bank was in the wrong. It took me issuing court proceedings, plus several more months of negotiating with their lawyer, before they finally settled out of court. Even then they tried to not pay the court fee, and they tried to get us to sign an NDA (I refused to budge on both). Altogether, it took 6 months to get the money. Similar to how people in this thread are talking about mitigating reliance on cloud providers (e.g. with offline backups), I now do not trust any bank. I avoid being in a position where any one bank can ruin my life. That means having multiple accounts and spreading my money around. Luckily for me I have a legal background so when a corp (big or small) does this sort of thing to me I don't hesitate to sue them. In almost all cases this causes them to "wake up" and start taking your issue seriously, in a way that the front line customer support reps never do. I recommend this to the author of the original post. |
| |
| ▲ | djoldman 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm curious how big the bank was and what country this is in? It's my understanding that banks really don't want your money once they've closed an account, they want you to take it back. Bigger banks, at least in the US, usually do this. | | |
| ▲ | throwawayffffas 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I am guessing it's not that they wanted the money. They thought there was something illegal happening and seized the money. I.e. not for themselves but for whatever law enforcement agency they thought might come looking for it. | |
| ▲ | f33d5173 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | If they thought you were money laundering, maybe giving it back would be a liability. |
| |
| ▲ | csomar 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I now do not trust any bank. It baffles me how much this community is opposed to Bitcoin (and fails to delimit it from the rest of the crypto-scams on going) when, for me, it is existential. When you go through 1-2 experiences of bank-freezing and you realize your life is literally at stake here, the abstract debates about energy consumption or speculative bubbles feel like they come from completely misinformed individuals. It's like watching someone on a rail track arguing not knowing what is about to hit them. | | |
| ▲ | f33d5173 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Self custody of cryptocurrency, for the vast majority of people, is riskier than putting their money in the bank. Most people lack the technical competence to keep their crypto secure, and the downside of losing access is much more significant. Notice that the stories regarding banks go "I had to sue them to get it back". With cryptocurrency, in the vast majority of cases, it would instead be "the money was gone for good". |
| |
| ▲ | AH4oFVbPT4f8 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Which bank? | | |
| ▲ | csomar 3 days ago | parent [-] | | all banks. Any bank that can indefinitely freeze your money and get away with it will do it. And now that everyone is doing it, the reputation damage is minimized. | | |
| ▲ | jama211 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | All banks can, but it’s not true to say all banks will. It’s also not reasonable to suggest that some banks aren’t worse than others, so when someone wants to know of a less unsafe bank we should recommend one. | |
| ▲ | AH4oFVbPT4f8 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Some banks do things that make you never want to do any business with them. Wells Fargo would open checking/savings/credit card accounts without their customers knowing, then Wells Fargo fired thousands of employees as a result of being caught. I will do everything possible to never to business with them. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | trinix912 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > It sounds like they were “all in” on Apple with zero backups, which shows some questionable judgment iCloud literally encourages users to opt for storing originals only in the cloud. It's marketed as such, it nags you about this every now and then, and iCloud is the preinstalled default cloud storage on every iPhone. Consider non-techies dealing with this too. |
|
| ▲ | 0manrho 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > which shows some questionable judgment Convenience is a hell of a drug. |
|
| ▲ | nickhodge 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| When you are an Apple Developer, as the poster states - it goes deeper and more destructive. |
|
| ▲ | parisidau 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I do have backups of most data, including photos, but there are things you can't backup like shared actively edited iWork documents, and things like that. I can rebuild from it, but it's still a shitshow and my very expensive devices are bricked. |
| |
| ▲ | holigot 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | What a nightmare - hope everything will end well. Concerning all those 'bricked' devices it would be really nice to get some more details concerning the 'block'. Can you use your iPhone to call someone, can you use your MacBook overall? Login, use Apple Passwords(!), looking at photos within photos app and so on... Or are all those devices completely locked? | |
| ▲ | parisidau a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Apple (via Executive Relations) says they won't do anything. Guess I'm stuffed. | |
| ▲ | xigoi 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > there are things you can't backup like shared actively edited iWork documents If they’re shared, surely someone else can still access them? | |
| ▲ | Aachen 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | What's an iWord and why can't it be backed up? | | |
| ▲ | thih9 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Nobody said iWord. | | |
| ▲ | Aachen a day ago | parent [-] | | My apologies, I see I've misread it. Still don't know what iWork is. Surely what the question referred to was obvious | | |
| ▲ | parisidau 20 hours ago | parent [-] | | Here, I Googled it for you https://www.apple.com/iwork/ | | |
| ▲ | Aachen 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | Oh, so I did understand correctly that it's Apple's version of Word etc. My question was why one can't back up one's data though. I'm even more confused now that I know it refers to Pages/Keynote/etc. since those have always been file-based so far as I've seen from classmates who used it. Surely even Apple allows downloading your documents and spreadsheets from whatever storage front-end their live editing server uses? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | insane_dreamer 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > this sort of thing shouldn’t be possible any more than a bank deciding to take all your money with no recourse. (They can close your account, but they can’t keep your money.) To me this is the biggest problem. Just like a bank can decide to close your account at any time, it's reasonable that Apple (or any business) could do the same. But they can't keep your stuff. You can say "don't be naive and assume your cloud data is safe", but in today's world that's like saying "don't keep your money in a bank". The reason I pay for iCloud storage is because it's supposed to be safe (safer than my local HDD going bust or getting lost). |
|
| ▲ | IshKebab 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You can probably use a GDPR personal information request to get photos and data at least. Doesn't help with other stuff you've paid for though. We really need laws for this sort of thing. They should have included it in the DMA for gatekeepers. |
|
| ▲ | st3fan 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Great victim blaming there buddy. |
| |
| ▲ | beeflet 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | To what extent is the victim their own perpetrator? They allow the status quo to succeed by endorsing it. They voted for this with $30,000 of their own money, and they will likely vote again. | | |
| ▲ | wiseowise 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | So taking a wrong turn should result in you being mugged, raped and subsequently killed because apparently there was some "safe", but less convenient, passage?
You're not helping OSS by making claims like these. | | |
| ▲ | noitpmeder 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Obviously you're being facetious, that is not at all what that poster is claiming. While I agree that entering a dark alley shouldn't result in ill effects, if ill effects happen in said dark alley it is still worth the discussion to remind people to stay out of dark alleys in today's day and age (or until the root problem, whatever it is, is improved). Pretending that it is OK to enter dark alleys and forcing blame elsewhere will continue to have people unwittingly enter dark alleys. | | |
| ▲ | lapcat 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > While I agree that entering a dark alley shouldn't result in ill effects, if ill effects happen in said dark alley it is still worth the discussion to remind people to stay out of dark alleys in today's day and age (or until the root problem, whatever it is, is improved). This is not a dark alley. It's the main street. It's the world we live in. iPhone has more than half the market share in the US and well over a billion users worldwide. Moreover, Apple, Google, and Microsoft collectively monopolize consumer operating systems on both mobile and desktop. Try going into a retail store and buying a computing device that is not running iOS, Android, macOS, or Windows. That's the reality for most people. The dark alleys are the non-mainstream options that hardly anyone knows about. | | |
| ▲ | chongli 3 days ago | parent [-] | | To further stretch the analogy: the main street is now full of potholes, sinkholes, and even landmines. The root problem is that, in exchange for convenience, we as a society have ceded too much power to these large businesses and we are now paying the price for it. We have bought the proverbial monorail [1] and now we are stuck with it. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taJ4MFCxiuo | | |
| ▲ | lapcat 3 days ago | parent [-] | | > The root problem is that, in exchange for convenience, we as a society have ceded too much power to these large businesses and we are now paying the price for it. I don't know why some people have made "convenience" into a dirty word. Almost everything we do is for convenience. You could live in a remote log cabin with no electricity and grow/hunt your own food, separating yourself from most of society, but that wouldn't be convenient or pleasant. Individual consumers have very little power over the market. There's a collective action problem, which is why governments and regulation exist... or should exist. The way I see it, the root problem is a massive failure by (corrupt) governments to protect consumer rights. | | |
| ▲ | chongli 3 days ago | parent [-] | | How do governments become corrupt in the first place though, if they don't start that way? It's collective action problems all the way down. Perhaps the root problem is that we've blown too far past Dunbar's number to be able to deal with the societies we live in. All of these systems we've contrived to mitigate the trust problem are full of holes. As for convenience, that carries a tradeoff. All of the technology and all of the revolutions we've had (agricultural, industrial, information technology) have come with these tradeoffs. Even the log cabin has downsides compared to the nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyle. | | |
| ▲ | lapcat 3 days ago | parent [-] | | > How do governments become corrupt in the first place though, if they don't start that way? I think the US government did start that way. Maybe not "corrupt" as such, but the United States was founded by plutocrats and was clearly designed to protect the minority of plutocrats against mass democracy. > Even the log cabin has downsides compared to the nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyle. Yes, but I'd say the nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyle has even greater downsides, and our current state of convenience is in many ways a vast improvement over the precarious existence of our distant ancestors. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | wiseowise 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | There are 1.5 BILLIONS of iOS users. Is that what you call a dark alley? This is a broad day, city center attack. | | |
| ▲ | rvnx 3 days ago | parent [-] | | So many asslickers of Apple here, blaming the victim when clearly anyone could be the next victim. The same issue with clouds like Google Cloud that can charge you 100k USD tomorrow just because of someone doing a loop of wget on a cdn endpoint. The real solution is to have a neutral, efficient and formal process under supervision of regulators to have such case escalated and handled. I already see all the tech-bros coming: “you see it was not an issue, they reinstated the account after you posted” while ignoring there are silent victims. | | |
| ▲ | iamnothere 2 days ago | parent [-] | | If I entrust money to someone who I know to be a thief, and then he runs off with it, how am I not at least partially culpable for my own negligence? Obviously the thief is the criminal and deserves to be punished and to pay restitution, but the idiot who should know better isn’t blameless. One can express a need for regulation while also being aghast that people are still falling for the cloud scam, despite the overwhelming evidence that it is indeed a scam. | | |
| ▲ | wiseowise 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > I know to be a thief A trillion dollar company with premium hardware and software that has more than 50% smartphone share in US and is used by 1.5 billion people worldwide is not "know to be a thief". Your rant is essentially a crazy hobo stashing cash under his mattress and calling anyone using a bank idiot. | | |
| ▲ | iamnothere a day ago | parent [-] | | Banks, except for Wells Fargo, are not known to steal your money. Cloud services, however, are well-known for this kind of thing, especially in tech circles. Most people think it’s so rare that it won’t happen to them. And they are right, statistically, but they don’t consider the outsized impact if they are wrong. Most people don’t save enough to handle an emergency, even if they have the cash flow for it. Most people don’t do basic, cheap preparation for a natural or manmade disaster. Most people don’t do at least minimal planning to make life easier for their families and loved ones if they are incapacitated or die, until very late in life. Most people are indeed idiots. |
| |
| ▲ | jama211 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Calling 1.5 billion people idiots because they use a service where this happened to like one guy is too much of a stretch. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | xigoi 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | More like taking a deal with the devil and then being surprised that you lost your soul. | |
| ▲ | csomar 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | That's not what happened here though. The victim paid the muggers... so as you can see something is very wrong in this relationship. |
| |
| ▲ | jbs789 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Victim blaming is simply a way to feel comfortable that it won’t happen to you. The takeaway should be that it CAN happen to you. | | |
| |
| ▲ | knallfrosch 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | read the TOS before agreeing | | |
| ▲ | left-struck 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Let’s be real, the number of people who read it approaches zero. Not only does no one read it but it seems like they are intentionally designed to be difficult to read. They are written by lawyers for lawyers, not for common people to read. | | |
| ▲ | hollow-moe 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | You don't even have to actually read them, just assume the worst case for the customer and you'll be right. | |
| ▲ | fmajid 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | LLMs actually do a good job at reading legalese, this may finally reverse the trend of corporations using inpenetrable language to screw over customers. Of course, that doesn't help in the US with its vicious Supreme Court endorsing the most blatant abuses under cover of binding aritration. |
| |
| ▲ | wiseowise 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | And then what? Go to Google, Samsung, any other Android vendor and read the same TOS? There should be laws to protect people, instead of blaming victims. | |
| ▲ | trinix912 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Every single cloud storage provider has a generic cop-out clause in their TOS that allows them to lock you out of your account for no reason at all, with no legal obligation to provide any proper justification. This leaves you with just about zero cloud storage solutions that you can use. Yes, yes, you can rsync your files to your NAS. Now explain that to your non tech-savvy neighbors. |
|
|