| ▲ | acephal 2 days ago |
| Altman should be jailed for this. Single-handedly crashing consumer spending in an entire sector of the economy. At the very least for the reason that that was supposed to happen _after_ they had the AI in hand to supplant majority white collar labor, not before. |
|
| ▲ | pmdr 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| This is a dystopia no one really thought about. A handful of people anointed to spend borrowed money on a (so far unprofitable) quest to destabilize the world's economy, alienate the working class and make everything we've enjoyed the past 15-20 years a luxury. |
| |
| ▲ | lovich 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | No? Lots of philosophers and writers thought about the problems that happen when capital concentrates to the level that individuals can move nations. It’s like a whole fucking genre. What we call capitalism now is just reverting back to monarchism where the handful of rulers decide everything and we stop getting the market to be responsive to reality. Prepare for more absurd and random shortages as our betters play around with their toys | | |
| ▲ | the_real_cher 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah weve gone so far past markets at this point Companies that are essentially monopolies have greater income than most countries GDP, with government bailouts, with the Federal reserve printing money like crazy, the interest on government debt is greater than military spending. This is monarchy wearing the skin of capitalism. |
| |
| ▲ | dontlaugh 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | How so? The drive towards monopoly, tendency of the rate of profit to fall, over and under production and cyclical ever worsening crises are aspects of capitalism well studied and understood over a century ago. | |
| ▲ | beeflet 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | a dystopian world in which computer memory is sort of expensive, god save us | | |
| ▲ | LorenDB 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | "Sort of expensive" doesn't really convey the true state of affairs, i.e. memory prices have jumped 300% or more. | |
| ▲ | reaperducer 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Maybe programmers will have to start making their programs efficient again. Maybe OpenAI's RAM monopoly is what kills Electron. | | |
| ▲ | dijit a day ago | parent | next [-] | | vibe coders are likely to use electron. Sam is betting that vibe coders are the future. Whoever wins, we lose. | |
| ▲ | checker659 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Electron is no match for a O(n^3) algorithm. | |
| ▲ | ethbr1 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | 1. Man creates apps 2. Browser destroys apps 3. Browser creates apps 4. AI destroys browser apps ... 5. AI eats all memory 6. Forth inherits the Earth | | |
| |
| ▲ | wpm 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Memory today Water tomorrow This is the natural consequence of letting individual psychos control more money than most world economies. | | |
| ▲ | beeflet 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I am not convinced by this whole AI water scare. Doesn't the water just evaporate? It's not a finite resource like oil. If the problem is that these companies are creating an externality by straining the local water supply, then maybe we should simply tax water more where appropriate? I don't think any sort of shame will be effective. For the past decade water has been mismanaged in inefficient farming practices, like bad irrigation practices or production of alfalfa to feed foreign livestock. We also waste a ton of water on our big dumb lawns. "cooling datacenters" doesn't seem like that big of a deal. | | |
| ▲ | iteria a day ago | parent [-] | | Fresh water is a finite resource. It replenishes extremely slowly in certain forms. Like ground water. Lakes and rivers can run dry if you pull too much from them, see: Iran. AI data centers are making the problem of overuse worse. We were already pulling too much water in areas. With these data centers, some places that didn't have a problem are starting to. | | |
| ▲ | rowanG077 a day ago | parent [-] | | Fresh water is not a finite resource. You can simply make more by taking sea water and pumping in energy. It's not cheap but it's doable. | | |
| ▲ | abenga a day ago | parent | next [-] | | In the short term (while you build your desalinators), and in local water-stressed regions, it very much is. | |
| ▲ | dijit a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | perhaps the most hackernews take in this thread. desalination isn’t just expensive, it’s existentially costly in terms of energy consumption, and I don’t see any dyson spheres in production. | | |
| ▲ | rowanG077 a day ago | parent [-] | | With modern desalination facilities it costs literally on the order of cents per liter. It's an inconvenience at worst in the modern world. It costs approx 3kwh of energy to desalinate one cubic meter of water. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | derektank 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| We’re contemplating jailing people for buying manufactured goods at the market price now? |
| |
| ▲ | stackskipton 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes? Reports are that OpenAI is buying unfinished memory kits which they have no capacity to complete. It appears that OpenAI is just buying them to remove them from the market and damage their competitors. In United States, that used to be considered against the law if we were actually enforcing such things. | | |
| ▲ | m00x 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Since COVID, this has been the norm for any industry that requires chips. Operation handbook now dictates that you should have 3-4 years of all the ICs you'll need for production so you don't end up like the car manufacturers. | | |
| ▲ | ralphc an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | The reason my 2018 Chevrolet has HDR radio and my wife's 2024 doesn't. | |
| ▲ | downrightmike a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Massively over inflating your vehicles to the point they can't move them in the market? |
| |
| ▲ | ikeashark 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I doubt this is to create artificial scarcity. Especially when OpenAI is the biggest player thought to be able to build AGI first and that it is now backed by the US & the Saudis. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > thought to be able to build AGI first Who still thinks this? | | |
| ▲ | ikeashark 2 days ago | parent [-] | | The US Government, Saudis, consumer/private investors apparently or at least the one that can build the most economically useful AI. I myself believe Google is most likely. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | hodgehog11 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As always, it's the intent that matters. For the sake of argument, what if Amazon decided tomorrow that they would secure exclusive contracts with all food suppliers and then hoard all the food to starve out the people they don't want to have it? Or at least, drive up the price of food so it becomes completely unaffordable? I know people can simply grow their own food so it's a bit different, but hopefully it gets the point across. It's anti-trust on an unprecedented level. | | |
| ▲ | ikeashark 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | But OpenAI legitimately needs HBM. Amazon in this instance doesn't need food and is doing purely to create artificial scarcity. If OpenAI were to actually not use the HBM then it could mean something. | | |
| ▲ | hodgehog11 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | That's the whole problem: it's unlikely that OpenAI will actually use all of that HBM. It seems probable that they are using it to create artificial scarcity for their competitors. | |
| ▲ | doctorwho42 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | "needs" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in your argument... |
| |
| ▲ | back_to_basics 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | "As always, it's the intent that matters." That's certainly not a universal Legal Standard.
If I'm harmed, but you didn't "intend" to harm me, does that nullify my Claim? Hardly. | | |
| ▲ | hodgehog11 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | IANAL, but yes, I believe it can nullify the claim. Bumping into someone on the sidewalk is only battery if the prosecution demonstrates intent to harm. | |
| ▲ | lovich 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Lack of intent doesn’t mean your claim is nullified. “Intent matters” means it’s taken into account when deciding what damages were wrought | |
| ▲ | unethical_ban 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Voluntary manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter, degrees of murder, hate crimes. |
| |
| ▲ | squigz 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I know people can simply grow their own food Small thing, but this is not simple or realistic at all. How does someone in an apartment grow enough food for their family? | | |
| ▲ | hodgehog11 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Yeah it would definitely still be a problem, but history shows that life finds a way. Even if everyone has to eat nothing but planted potatoes from any patch of grass that one can lay eyes on. | | |
| ▲ | squigz a day ago | parent [-] | | What history has taught us is that life finds a way by staying together and each person having their function within society, only some of which is growing or producing food. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | kasabali 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | They didn't buy "manufactured goods", they reserved 40% of the yearly wafer output for the whole world that haven't even been made yet for themselves. | | |
| ▲ | BaconVonPork a day ago | parent [-] | | Then if AI were the only consumer of wafers they would fall short of declaring themselves an illegal monopoly. |
| |
| ▲ | sh34r 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The Sherman Antitrust Act has outlawed abuses of monopsony power since 1890. What we should really be asking is, why did we ever stop jailing wanton criminals like Scam Alt-Man? | | |
| ▲ | lenerdenator 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Simple: they create value for the right people. Namely, politicians who get their donations, and a generation that, despite not having enough children to grow the economy organically, doesn't want to work any... er... wants to retire. Thus, they invest in retirement and pension funds, who in turn invest the money in businesses to earn a return. Since that return must increase constantly, and organic growth is no longer possible, you have to pull shenanigans as a businessman to meet the requirements of the shareholders, lest they kick you out of the plane with a golden parachute. So we let them do those shenanigans and the politicians don't do anything about it. | | |
| ▲ | andrekandre 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > they invest in retirement and pension funds, who in turn invest the money in businesses to earn a return
maybe not a popular opinion but, this is the original sin imo; putting retirement/pension on the market makes for so many perverse incentives to keep things growing at any cost... | | |
| ▲ | drtgh 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | The system is perverse per se, you create money based on debt, and eternal growth, and devalue savings, and force people to bet in order to try to preserve savings value, then each ten or fifteen years you allow someones to harvest the rewards of the casino. And when population start to decrease (on developed countries), you rise the alarm, "more population is needed due to the decline in the birth rate", promoting an eternal growth that would need the resources several planets if everyone had a decent standard of living. | |
| ▲ | morgan814 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Used to be someone had to crack the whip. Now the workers do it to themselves. |
|
| |
| ▲ | exasperaited 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I find it fascinating that he's had the benefit of the doubt for soooo long. This is the shitcoin-for-your-eyeball-scans guy; the guy who didn't tell the board of his own company that he controlled their startup fund through an alias. |
| |
| ▲ | Analemma_ 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yes, and I actually think it's a symptom of advanced societal decay that you think this is somehow an unreasonable proposition. What OpenAI is doing will drive up prices for years, shredding consumer welfare, limiting competition and forcing marginally-profitable products off the market, and they're not even going to use the RAM. They're wrecking supply chains simply because they no longer have any technical advantage now that Google and Anthropic have caught up and passed them, and have to resort to dirty tricks like this and digital heroin Sora to try and justify their valuation. No functioning society would or should allow you to get away with that. Frankly, much worse things than jail should happen to Altman for this kind of torching of the commons, and jail is the watered-down compromise position. | | |
| ▲ | exasperaited 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > Frankly, much worse things than jail should happen to Altman for this kind of torching of the commons, and jail is the watered-down compromise position. Some days I think the devastating crash of the economy that will come if the bubble bursts is the least worst outcome. Do people not feel like the tensions around AI will not soon become internationally geopolitical? (It's already nationally geopolitical in the USA: Trump is trying to assert federal control over the states' rights to set their own legislation) |
| |
| ▲ | back_to_basics 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | A gross mischaracterization, really. 1. Said "consumer" is effectively hoarding Supply, and thus distorting the Market.
2. Said "consumer" has no effective means to either Deploy nor Utilize said products as neither the Data Centers nor the Energy required to power them are in existence.
3. Said "consumer" has articulated his belief that the Taxpayer should "backstop" his endeavors in some capacity, as well. If you don't find this offensive in the least and possibly criminal at worst, then I don't understand your thought process. | |
| ▲ | Dylan16807 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Didn't they sign some big contacts to lock in non-market prices? | |
| ▲ | heavyset_go 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | People go to prison for market manipulation all of the time. | | |
| ▲ | exasperaited 2 days ago | parent [-] | | went to prison. In the USA, nobody need ever go to prison for market manipulation anymore; they simply have to be able to pay the price necessary for a pardon. No logical consistency applies to the process. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | energy123 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That contract had little to do with this but I get why it's an easy, neatly packaged, personified scapegoat. The ram price appreciation began 3 months before October 1st and his contract was about future capacity that has nothing to do with the current equilibrium price in consumer DRAM. |
|
| ▲ | Palmik 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Jailed for what? Apple routinely buys out majority of TSMC's production capacity (at the bleeding edge), should Tím Cook go to jail? |
| |
| ▲ | Der_Einzige 2 days ago | parent [-] | | A surprising amount of people are gleefully happy to have their perceived enemies put in jail or worse even if and especially if there was no legitimate justification for it. A lot of people on HN dislike Tim Cook for various reasons and many would literally “sacrifice” him just to get Apple to stop being so anti-consumer. |
|
|
| ▲ | jdprgm 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It certainly feels like this should fall somewhere along a spectrum of antitrust behavior. It's astounding the degree to which they are able to operate as if money isn't real. Strange circular deals and infinite VC money really fuck with markets and these past few years we've been venturing down a particularly concerning branch of capitalism. |
|
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | cyanydeez 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| He's just one of the ringleaders of the AI parade. This certainly isn'tjust him, just like the american corruption isn't just donald trump |
|
| ▲ | beeflet 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Won't someone think of the gamers? |
| |
| ▲ | neogodless 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Eh my (anemic) work laptop from 2019 probably won't get replaced for an extra year because my employer won't authorize the big laptop order at inflated prices. |
|
|
| ▲ | hyperpape 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [flagged] |
| |
| ▲ | Tadpole9181 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm pretty sure this clearly runs afoul of anticompetitive laws, no? Altman is intentionally sabotaging the global electronics supply chain using their existing market dominance to prevent competitors from being able to operate. And, tangentially, I really don't know what world you lived in. The US has arrested civil rights leaders and overthrown countries and went through an entire era of McCarthyism to get here: where the US president is having investigations into his political enemies for what amounts to "disloyalty". It's basically a national given that cops plant evidence on black folk regularly. Since when has America been this bastion of lawfulness? | | |
| ▲ | hyperpape 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Since it clearly runs afoul of anticompetitive laws, it will be easy for you to find case law that demonstrates that, alongside credible sources stating that OpenAIs actions are prosecutable that make that case. This is big news, it's not like the folks who write about antitrust would just ignore it. | |
| ▲ | asa400 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Serious question: should the principals of the RAM manufacturers be jailed? | | |
| ▲ | sh34r 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I believe it depends on which parties are responsible for the criminal antitrust violations. Is it the manufacturers abusing monopoly power, or is it OpenAI abusing monopsony power? I’m not a lawyer or a forensic accountant, but given how remarkably stable the RAM market was until SCAMA disrupted it, I’m inclined to think the answer to your question is a resounding “no.” | |
| ▲ | estimator7292 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The ones that collude to fix prices need to be in jail, yes. | |
| ▲ | asa400 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Clarifying because I think the downvoters maybe misunderstood the nature of my question: I meant, in the opinion of the parent commenter should the principals of Samsung etc. be jailed? I wasn’t taking a position myself, just asking what they thought. |
|
| |
| ▲ | sh34r 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You should look up the monopsony provisions of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, as well as the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936 which prohibits predatory price discrimination schemes. Scam Alt-Man should be paying the same price for RAM as us plebes, if the DOJ wasn’t derelict in its duty to enforce antitrust law. It’s wild how Bork’s fraudulent legal theories have been converted to into dogma within a generation. | | |
| ▲ | WorkerBee28474 2 days ago | parent [-] | | mo·nop·so·ny /məˈnäpsənē/ a market situation in which there is only one buyer. It seems like the issue we're having is that we are buyers who are competing against OpenAI, who is another buyer. There isn't only 1 buyer or 1 seller of RAM. | | |
| ▲ | sh34r 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Like monopolies, monopsony power exists on a spectrum. For example, Walmart exercises extreme monopsony power over suppliers, despite not being the only retailer in town. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | heavyset_go 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| We need to normalize tar & feathering again. |