At the very least, I appreciate that this test should help us determine the causal impact of social media. I don't know if rolling out to the whole country is justified just for the test data, but I feel it will give a pretty conclusive result one way or the other.

▲

hephaes7us 3 days ago | parent [-]

Teens will learn to bypass all this within the week. Then, whatever the new way of doing social media will be, it could easily reach consensus within the year.

▲

pinkmuffinere 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Even if it achieves only a small reduction in usage (say 10%), i would expect that should have a measurable effect on happiness if the hypothesis of [social media causes unhappiness] is true. If no increase in happiness is observed, i think we could say that social media does not cause unhappiness.

▲

nazgul17 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Not so sure. The government has placed a A$50M incentive per violation discovered, I heard. That sounds like a powerful incentive on the companies to outsmart the kids.

	▲	hephaes7us 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		If a kid uses a pseudonymous account and fraudulently bypasses an age verification system, I have a hard time believing that the company would be fined $50M. I would guess that this massive fine is more for situations like if a company can be shown to have wilfully allowed a violation or else has been grossly negligent. (But I have not read the law!)
	▲	justatdotin 3 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		violation would be: not making a reasonable effort, violation would not be: a kid bypassing their reasonable effort.