| ▲ | d3Xt3r 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
That's mainly an nVidia issue. On AMD, Linux is actually faster and more stable compared to Windows. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Night_Thastus 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There seems to be little evidence of that, at least from a reputable source. For some games it can be. For some games Proton performs far worse than Windows. It's not steady across the board. And some have stability issues, bugs, major performance problems, or just flat out don't work. I want Proton to be the future as well, but I think it's important not to oversell it as a drop-in replacement either. EDIT: GN highly recommends against apples-to-oranges comparisons of the two, but even looking at their own data for AMD cards (with exact same CPU, RAM, and motherboard) it clearly shows Proton being behind on the order of 6-15%. Not a lot, but not ahead either. You can compare the numbers for the AMD cards against this video's here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yP0axVHdP-U EDIT 2: Instead of just down-voting because the result makes you unhappy, how about responding with well-sourced proof otherwise? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||