What traffic would you request the upstream providers to block if getting hit by Aisuru? Considering the botnet consists of residential routers, those are the same networks your users will be originating from. Sure, in best case, if your site is very regional, you can just block all traffic outside your country - but most services don't have this luxury.

Blocking individual IP addresses? Sure, but consider that before your service detects enough anomalous traffic from one particular IP and is able to send the request to block upstream, your service will already be down from the aggregate traffic. Even a "slow" ddos with <10 packets per second from one source is enough to saturate your 10Gbps link if the attacker has a million machines to originate traffic from.

▲

codedokode 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In many cases the infected devices are in developing countries where none of your customers is. Many sites are regional, for example, a medium business operating within one country, or even city.

And even if the attack comes from your country, it is better to block part of the customers and figure out what to do next rather than have your site down.

▲

amaccuish 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Could it not be argued that ISPs should be forced to block users with vulnerable devices?

They have all the data on what CPE a user has, can send a letter and email with a deadline, and cut them off after it expires and the router has not been updated/is still exposed to the wide internet.

▲

hombre_fatal 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

My dad’s small town ISP called him to say his household connection recently started saturating the link 24/7 and to look into whether a device had been compromised.

(Turns out some raspi reseller shipped a product with empty uname/password)

While a cute story, how do you scale that? And what about all the users that would be incapable of troubleshooting it, like if their laptop, roku, or smart lightbulb were compromised? They just lose internet?

And what about a botnet that doesn’t saturate your connection, how does your ISP even know? They get full access to your traffic for heuristics? What if it’s just one curl request per N seconds?

Not many good answers available if any.

	▲	mschuster91 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> While a cute story, how do you scale that? And what about all the users that would be incapable of troubleshooting it, like if their laptop, roku, or smart lightbulb were compromised? They just lose internet? Uh, yes. Exactly and plainly that. We also go and suspend people's driver licenses or at the very least seriously fine them if they misbehave on the road, including driving around with unsafe cars. Access to the Internet should be a privilege, not a right. Maybe the resulting anger from widespread crackdowns would be enough of a push for legislators to demand better security from device vendors. > And what about a botnet that doesn’t saturate your connection, how does your ISP even know? In ye olde days providers had (to have to) abuse@ mailboxes. Credible evidence of malicious behavior reported to these did lead to customers getting told to clean up shop or else.

▲

6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

SJC_Hacker 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Xfinity did exactly this to me a few years ago. I wasn't compromised but tried running a blockchain node on my machine. The connection to the whole house was blocked off until I stopped it.

▲

encom 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It could be argued that ISPs should not snoop on my traffic, barring a court order.