| ▲ | amaccuish 9 hours ago | |||||||
Could it not be argued that ISPs should be forced to block users with vulnerable devices? They have all the data on what CPE a user has, can send a letter and email with a deadline, and cut them off after it expires and the router has not been updated/is still exposed to the wide internet. | ||||||||
| ▲ | hombre_fatal 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
My dad’s small town ISP called him to say his household connection recently started saturating the link 24/7 and to look into whether a device had been compromised. (Turns out some raspi reseller shipped a product with empty uname/password) While a cute story, how do you scale that? And what about all the users that would be incapable of troubleshooting it, like if their laptop, roku, or smart lightbulb were compromised? They just lose internet? And what about a botnet that doesn’t saturate your connection, how does your ISP even know? They get full access to your traffic for heuristics? What if it’s just one curl request per N seconds? Not many good answers available if any. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||
| ▲ | SJC_Hacker 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Xfinity did exactly this to me a few years ago. I wasn't compromised but tried running a blockchain node on my machine. The connection to the whole house was blocked off until I stopped it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | encom 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It could be argued that ISPs should not snoop on my traffic, barring a court order. | ||||||||