| ▲ | rkomorn 10 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Call me cynical but I don't at all believe the issue is tax jurisdictions or anything related to complexity. It's that it's easier to show a price of $0.99 and have the consumer pay $1.08 (for example) than either show a price of $1.08 and have the consumer pay it, or show a price of $0.99 and have the consumer pay $0.99 and "lose" 7 cents (because your price was $0.92 before taxes). Pre-tax price is lower and sells better than post-tax price. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jedberg 10 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
That wouldn't apply if everyone included tax in their prices. In this case, the item would just be $1.10. If the business really thinks they will lose money by pricing over a dollar, then yes, they would have to take that hit. But they are already taking that hit if the "real value" is $1.02 for example. It's just a price/demand curve. They would simply have to optimize it differently. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||