| ▲ | badpun 12 hours ago |
| Sportsmen compete in imaginary competitions with equally physially gifted people just to win a prize. And yet, many are fulfilled by it. For some people, competing is what drives them. |
|
| ▲ | impossiblefork 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Yes, but then you know it's a game, so there's no self-deception that you're actually doing something meaningful. This realization thus gives the whole sportsmanship concept. |
| |
| ▲ | jacinda 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think many people in the Bay Area also see careers as a game. | |
| ▲ | aleph_minus_one 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | >
Yes, but then you know it's a game, so there's no self-deception that you're actually doing something meaningful. I have reasons to believe that many very successful athletes do have this self-deception. | | |
| ▲ | 1minusp 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | Can be argued that there is intuitive satisfaction/pleasure/utility that spectators gain from watching sports competitions. The payoff is a lot more obvious/instant. Whereas with a lot of tech these days, what needle are we really moving? Are people truly happier scrolling for two hours, compared with watching an edge-of-seat soccer game? | | |
| ▲ | jihadjihad 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | The idea appears to be to simulate the edge-of-seat sensation and, ideally, to charge for the privilege of the experience. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | maerF0x0 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > many are fulfilled by it. At least in my sampling, I'd suggest the most extremely driven people often have some major sense of lack they're chasing. |