| ▲ | 1313ed01 4 days ago | |||||||
I guess it made a lot of sense to implement compilers in 32-bit protected mode to get more space to work with easier? Free Pascal's compiler also requires 32-bit even if it can generate 16-bit DOS code as well (at least when cross-compiling from some other OS; I have not tried to cross-compile from DOS 32-bit compiler to DOS 16-bit executable). Some people (and by that I mean Debian people; not sure about anyone else) disagree about OpenWatcom being free software. The license has some unusual requirement(s). There has been talk for a long time about possibly fixing that, but I do not know how on track that is (or how much it matters, in practice): https://github.com/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/discussions/27... | ||||||||
| ▲ | WalterBright 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I developed on a 32 bit machine because of memory protection. Memory corruption resulted in seg faults, while in 16 bit real mode memory corruption would scramble your hard disk. I ran all the test suites on protected machines. Only when everything was perfect did I run the programs in real mode DOS. Protected mode memory is the greatest advance ever in computer hardware. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | kragen 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Thanks for the pointer: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=376431 It seems a bit questionable but not an open-and-shut not-open-source license. | ||||||||