| ▲ | WalterBright 4 days ago | |
I developed on a 32 bit machine because of memory protection. Memory corruption resulted in seg faults, while in 16 bit real mode memory corruption would scramble your hard disk. I ran all the test suites on protected machines. Only when everything was perfect did I run the programs in real mode DOS. Protected mode memory is the greatest advance ever in computer hardware. | ||
| ▲ | kragen a day ago | parent [-] | |
I wonder if it's obsolete now that we have things like Wasm. I mean, in some sense, it's nothing new—the UCSD p-System, EUMEL, and Dijkstra's THE offered the same safety much earlier, just at a punishing performance cost. Also, though, you could imagine a system that protected the hard disk from corruption without having to be involved every time the CPU accessed RAM. For example, you could warm-boot into a trusted executive every time you wanted to flush the I/O queue to the hard disk. Rebooting would reload the executive code from the disk and set a "supervisor" bit on the disk interface, which the trusted executive would clear before yielding control back to the untrusted user program. | ||