Remix.run Logo
TMWNN a day ago

>What we're seeing right now is the fossil fuel energy economy stopping. We need it to stop; if it doesn't stop, we're all going to starve to death within a generation or so.

What are the odds that Stross said, wrote, or at least fervently believed the same thing c. 2000? Very high, I would bet.

Bjartr a day ago | parent | next [-]

I've always read the phrase "within a generation" to mean "within a generational lifespan", not "the time between groups we distinguish as distinct generations". Which is to say that under that interpretation it wouldn't be inconsistent to have believed it in both 2000 and 2025

ryoshu a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You can look it up on his blog: https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2006/06/

unholyguy001 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean there is certainly tons of evidence that some fossil fuels (coal most notably) are on the way out. Fossil fuels as a class? Maybe but still a bit early to make that call

Unearned5161 a day ago | parent [-]

fun fact, the world burns more coal than it ever has. Take a look at Art Berman's talk at UT Austin, humanity has never transitioned off of anything.

MichaelNolan a day ago | parent [-]

The IEA (2024 WEO) has coal peaking in 2027, and all other fossil fuels peaking before 2030. Historically the IEA has vastly underestimated the growth in renewables. The 2025 report comes out soon, so we will see if anything changed in their prediction.

https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024