Remix.run Logo
barrenko a day ago

This may be incredibly offensive, but how big could a potential overlap be between ADHD and autism?

alterom a day ago | parent | next [-]

Pretty big. The key word is "comorbidity"; having one of them means you are more likely to have the other than a random person.

There's also an overlap in traits.

I'm AuDHD (autism + ADHD). You can read about my ADHD side if the experience (with memes!) here:

https://romankogan.net/adhd

subarctic a day ago | parent | next [-]

What a weird word for things that are non-lethal. Why don't they just call it correlation?

6581 a day ago | parent [-]

"morbus" also means disease, not just death.

senordevnyc a day ago | parent [-]

Neither autism nor ADHD are diseases.

a day ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
rockercoaster a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's not clear how distinctive a lot of mental health conditions are. For the most part we're just making up labels for groups of signs and symptoms, after all. To the extent the labels are "real" things mostly rests in their utility—I mean, that's sort of true of all labels for everything (what's a chair?) but these are far more fluid than most.

It could be that autism really is, exactly as we describe it and conceive of it, in some meaningful way defined by actual reality, a thing.

It could be that it's ten different things that aren't actually connected at all, but happen to look kinda similar. Some of which either are a variant of ADHD (or vice-versa, doesn't much matter) or just happen to include similar symptoms and behaviors that respond well to the same drugs and therapies we use to tread ADHD.

(now, to some degree we do have real tests we can do to pick up e.g. genetic markers of certain disorders, but these largely remain just another clue, not exactly solid proof, with some exceptions)

To illustrate: imagine we couldn't ever see the inside of a human body and just had to guess at what was going on when something went wrong. We'd probably have something we just called "bad kidney" that was actually several different problems, and we'd just throw drugs and other therapies at it until (often, but not always) some set of those relieved the symptoms. Meanwhile, sometimes it's a kidney stone, sometimes it's cancer, et c. And maybe we even have a whole step that's trying to figure out if it's "bad kidney" or "bad bladder" and sometimes we'd get that right, but sometimes wrong, but also some of the same medicines work for either (depending on the actual cause) so we might incorrectly diagnose "bad kidney" then accidentally correctly treat "bad bladder", and think we were right all along.

gopalv a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> how big could a potential overlap be between ADHD and autism?

The lack of executive function is overlapping, but this particular post might be more of an ADHD simulator.

The very first "Follow the morning routine" or not is where this veers off my experience of the spectrum.

"Changing plans because of situations internal or external" is hard.

The option should've been "Spend 20 minutes making eggs again, because the yolks weren't the right kind of runny", miss the train, take a cab to work, but tell the driver that you've now got a system for eggs which you didn't have today (yeah, fun fact, the recipe was off because they don't refrigerate them over in France).

herculity275 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There seems to be a prevalent pop psych view that a bunch of these conditions (Autism, ADHD, Anxiety-Depression, OCD) are sort of clustered together and people who manifest one will often manifest symptoms of others. It gets muddier because a lot of these conditions are understood as spectrums and different people who identify with them may manifest them in vastly different ways. I'm still hesitant that "autism" these days may describe either someone who's completely nonverbal and living in assisted living, or someone who's a successful academic/engineer/entrepreneur.

maleldil a day ago | parent | next [-]

> prevalent pop psych view

It's called comorbidities. It's very common in mental health conditions.

mrguyorama a day ago | parent | prev [-]

>pop psych

It is not "pop-psych", it is reality.

These are just labels we apply to buckets of symptoms. The underlying problems and biological differences that can cause these buckets of symptoms probably will be found, and then we can re-categorize things quite a bit. My bet is we do this within the next couple decades.

What causes difficulty is that actual symptoms of one of these buckets can cause behaviors and coping strategies that look like other ones.

Another issue is that these symptoms are not specific. What one neurodivergent person means by "I have sensory issues" is vastly different from another neurodivergent person, and your psych health provider will dig into those specifics and try and tease out which label fits the best, or whether it's even an example of that symptom. How those symptoms affect you is the entire point.

>I'm still hesitant that "autism" these days may describe either someone who's completely nonverbal and living in assisted living, or someone who's a successful academic/engineer/entrepreneur.

And you have that same feeling towards "blind" or "deaf" right? Since a lot of blind people struggle to lead "normal" lives but there are accomplished blind software devs right here on HN

Consider how many people live life with some sort of mild delusion and yet are perfectly functional 99% of the time. The brain is complicated and cannot ever be reduced to single dimensions like that, and it is weirdly good at still functioning when part of it is broken in some way, like with Broca's area or Phineas Gage.

Yes, "syndrome" and "disorder" are vague labels that don't have hard cutoffs or any test you can objectively run. That's the point of those words. When you have a hard test you can run, it becomes a "disease".

whatevertrevor a day ago | parent [-]

I also wonder if we kinda screwed ourselves by expanding pre-existing labels for disorders that appeared similar, instead of using a mixin pattern of describing the spectrum. So you could have a Photosensitivity and Social Inertness "Disorder" instead of people constantly debating whether your combination of symptoms is "bad enough" to be called Autism.

With Autism, as noted elsewhere in this thread, a general social understanding of it is required to help normalize environments that don't exclude autistic people. Having specific labels could, on the one hand, help bring focus towards the specific needs of those people. On the other hand, it's harder to convince people of a 100 different neurodiverse profiles than one...

pcthrowaway 21 hours ago | parent [-]

Honestly it's difficult to expect people to communicate all the things in the bucket that might apply to them. Naming the bucket is easier for a lot of purposes.

whatevertrevor 20 hours ago | parent [-]

I get that. On the other hand, by making the buckets smaller, you're forced to specify the corresponding phenomena a lot more. Which might actually help people understand what applies and what doesn't, better. Understanding something is pretty much a prerequisite to communicating it.

EDIT: I misread your comment earlier, ignore the above paragraph. I definitely get how exhausting it might be to list off everything. I suppose I feel the Autism label is too big at the moment to communicate effectively though. See the following, I think it still applies.

It also helps people on the other end. If someone says they have "Misophonia, Aural sensitivity, and Rejection Sensitivity" I would understand a lot more about their situation than if they simply said they're mildly Autistic.

nixonpjoshua a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The diagnostic criteria and symptoms have substantial overlap, ultimately everything in the DSM is a descriptive diagnosis not based on a mechanistic understanding of neurobiology so it's VERY likely that our categories don't map 1:1 to the underlying causes.

VPenkov a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

One is impulsive, the other requires structure. The two are not mutually exclusive though, because both conditions are pretty diverse. AuDHD is a term used to describe people with both.

soulofmischief a day ago | parent [-]

This is a massive oversimplification of both autism and ADHD which approaches uselessness. Impulsivity is one possible symptom of ADHD, but doesn't even begin to describe the experience, and by itself paints an incorrect picture of the experience. Same for autism and structure. I know plenty of people with autism who absolutely do not deal in structure.

I know it feels nice to be able to craft a simple narrative, but this narrative feels more harmful and misconstrued than useful.

al_borland a day ago | parent [-]

I have autism and have a lot of trouble with routine and rigid timelines. But I also have ADHD, so I suspect there is some internal struggle there. I want to have routine for a lot of things, I just can’t seem to make it happen.

pcthrowaway 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not offensive at all, in fact there's a massive overlap. See the chart at https://neurodivergentinsights.com/adhd-vs-autism/

tux3 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've seen Twitter use "AuDHD" for the intersection. It's big enough to have its own label and subgroup who identify with it.

joshcsimmons a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not at all - the stat I've heard is that 30-50% of autistics also have ADHD

bitwize a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Significant enough that the DSM-iV recognized ADHD symptoms as symptoms of autism and didn't allow a comorbid diagnosis of both conditions because of this. (The DSM-V does recognize both as possibly occurring together.)

dr-detroit a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]