| ▲ | jeroenhd 6 hours ago |
| > the controversial person behind Did I miss a controversy somewhere? |
|
| ▲ | andruby 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The "controversy" is probably referring to this: https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5823666/ladybird-web-browser... |
| |
| ▲ | jeroenhd 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Ah, thanks for the link. Looks like a storm in a glass of water, I'm happy it's not something bigger. The description had me afraid akling came out as full MAGA supporter or something crazy like that. | | | |
| ▲ | chaoskanzlerin 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'd like to caution the reader that Lunduke is a notoriously biased source, having drifted off into right-wing (and particularly anti-trans) activism in recent years. | |
| ▲ | balamatom 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | >That statement reads, in full, "This is a purely technical project. As such, it is not an appropriate arena to advertise your personal politics or religious beliefs. Any changes that appear ideologically motivated will be rejected." Yeah well tell me how a Web browser in the 2020s is not an ideological device. I'll wait. |
|
|
| ▲ | shadytrees 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Scroll through his X account -- Charlie Kirk and DHH content are some recent entries. He is one of those people who thinks tech should be apolitical without really interrogating what apolitical means or how it affects people who have been marginalized by politics |
| |
| ▲ | jeroenhd 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Hmm, I see what you mean. That's a little disappointing. I don't think the contents of any of his recent comments are extreme enough to consider him "controversial" yet, but the language he uses definitely remind me of supposedly "apolitical" or even "centrist" rhetoric. |
|
