▲ | SilverElfin a day ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I hate that this website doesn’t let you select text from within the document. But one part that stood out is emails that were withheld in discovery that claimed attorney-client privilege but had nothing in the email chain indicating content that would be subject to this. It seems like Amazon is abusing that to hide information from the justice system. I’ve heard that some other companies (Microsoft, Google) encourage employees to do this, but what’s in here is pretty brazen. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | cityzen a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why wouldn’t they? Do you think anything of any real consequence will happen? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | mikestew a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I hate that this website doesn’t let you select text from within the document. Eh? Works for me on an old 2012 MBP and Safari 15.6. As for the "looping in legal..." one weird trick that judges hate, eh, the discussions I've read in the past amounted to "how stupid do you assume judges to be?" Seems like a good way to get hammered in court. |