> They’re finally acknowledging that they allowed Biden to censor Americans by calling their viewpoints “misinformation”.

No they aren’t. Your own quotes say they terminated for their own policies. Not because of pressure by the government. They say if anything they resisted pressure.

Like with Facebooks post Trump 2.0 turnabout. It would be interesting to see the actual emails or letters from the officials showing what this pressure supposedly was and about what cases. This is just another big tech company giving Jim Jordan another letter he wanted.

Well, they didn’t come right out and say that they modified their policy on COVID-19 “misinformation” as a result of pressure from the White House, but we all know that they did. They started banning anyone who talked about how COVID-19 might have originated in a lab, or how that lab might have been doing Gain of Function research on coronaviruses. Now that most people think that a lab origin is likely they have changed their policies and are inviting people back. They never should have banned those people for expressing their opinions in the first place.

Why does the gov have to point out violations to the service provider’s terms?

Are we certain the gov sought and pointed out all violators of terms or only the ones the gov didn’t like?

Like, I’m sure Reddit users by the millions violated that platforms terms… did millions get the boot?