Remix.run Logo
fuzzer371 17 hours ago

[flagged]

elevation 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The Patriot Act was named to imply that its supporters are patriotic and its detractors are not.

The name "Antifa" has similar implications, while similarly missing the mark.

16 hours ago | parent | next [-]
[deleted]
fuzzer371 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

macinjosh 16 hours ago | parent | next [-]

[flagged]

amanaplanacanal 16 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Sometimes it's better to be strategic instead of going all Leroy Jenkins on stuff.

newAccount2025 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So you’re only serious if you give up and embrace violence? Least American take ever.

macinjosh 16 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

BolexNOLA 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Are you seriously asking this person why they aren’t picking up a weapon and heading out to solve our social/political problems?

macinjosh 16 hours ago | parent [-]

I’m not the one calling people nazis.

BolexNOLA 16 hours ago | parent [-]

No just challenging people to go commit violence. Totally the same thing.

macinjosh 16 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

esseph 14 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

fufxufxutc 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

cobertos 16 hours ago | parent | next [-]

[flagged]

fufxufxutc 16 hours ago | parent [-]

Okay, but do any of the people you're describing as Nazis (Trump, MAGA voters, people who don't lean left, etc.) subscribe to the tenets of national socialism? Given that you say they're "literally" Nazis, you would think that they would.

cobertos 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes I do. I recently joined a Discord to observe some of this (long story, didn't know what I was getting into) and that was a tenet of what was discussed. If you want specifics you'll have to email me because I'm not comfortable putting more details here.

throwaway-11-1 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

the Charlie Kirk memorial march in Huntington Beach had guys literally wearing "national socialism" shirts so yeah some of them definitely do

myvoiceismypass 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Patriot Front was literally marching through Orange County like a week ago.

For a refresher: https://extremism.gwu.edu/patriot-front

16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
delichon 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

amanaplanacanal 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Literal has more than one meaning. One is "figurative". Our brains want languages to hold still, but they keep moving! But even this old dog can learn new tricks.

fufxufxutc 16 hours ago | parent [-]

I hope you're joking.

amanaplanacanal 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

From Merriam Webster:

Can literally mean figuratively?

One of the definitions of literally that we provide is "in effect; virtually—used in an exaggerated way to emphasize a statement or description that is not literally true or possible." Some find this objectionable on the grounds that it is not the primary meaning of the word, which we define as "in a way that uses the ordinary or primary meaning of a term or expression." However, this extended definition of literally is commonly used, and its meaning is not quite identical to that of figuratively ("with a meaning that is metaphorical rather than literal").

Is the extended use of literally new?

The "in effect; virtually" meaning of literally is not new. It has been in regular use since the 18th century and may be found in the writings of some of the most highly regarded writers of the 19th and early 20th centuries, including Charles Dickens, Mark Twain, Charlotte Brontë, and James Joyce.

15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
qwerpy 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

16 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
major505 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Beating people who think different than you is the pretty much facism. Just saying.

16 hours ago | parent | next [-]
[deleted]
grumio 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>Beating people who think different than you is the pretty much facism.

No. Fascism is fascism.

I'd recommend reading Umberto Eco's "Ur-Fascism" if you are interested in learning.

cmxch 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It’s the grab bag for smears, nothing more.

major505 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

grumio 16 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm glad you came around to understanding what it is.

I'm not behaving like a kid, I just prefer if people don't whitewash what fascism means, like you did in your previous comment (but not in this one). Muddying the term only helps fascists, whether on purpose or inadvertently.

> If you going to punch people on the street don't complain when you and your friends are under a boot.

Please don't make such assumptions about me, and please don't wish me under a boot. That's rude.

Have a good day.

cies 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Fascism used to have a meaning. And that meaning used to be different from "violence towards those who think different".

But nowadays... It seems to be used by anyone who does not like a group. Like when people overuse the word narcissist to the point it just means "asshole as perceived by the observer".

baby 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

Ralfp 16 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We are on schedule. People seem to need to get a reminder every few generations why authoritarians are terrible at running the country. Sometimes the process is peaceful. Sometimes it isn’t.

But the blame is not 100% on the authoritarians. The „we’ll refuse to do anything about your living conditions so you’ll radicalise and vote in somebody radical” is part of the cycle too.

gubbler 14 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

endtime 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Maybe look up what the ACLU did in Skokie in 1978...

qwerpy 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well when impressionable people get to define for themselves what a Nazi is (e.g. a car dealership for a company whose CEO we don’t like) and then firebomb it in the name of “punching the Nazis” then yeah I’m glad we’re trying to get past that.

the_gastropod 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

[flagged]

Fricken 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

major505 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

throwmeaway222 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Well that's word play which means as much as Biden declaring people that want to make America Great are awful people.

philistine 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

One is an opinion voiced that has no legal consequence. The other is an order of the government declaring as terrorism what amounts to a philosophy. The president did not declare a group as terrorism, he declared an idea terrorism. How is that equivalent?

Smeevy 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Sure, buddy. It's all the exact same. This insanity is just like it was under Biden.

Remember the time that Biden canceled Gutfeld! and everyone went crazy about it? What about the time that Biden just gave himself the magical ability to tariff the rest of the world based on whimsy? What about all of the violence from those awful leftists every time some MAGA chud wore a "Let's go, Brandon!" shirt or put a sticker of Biden hog-tied and gagged on the back of their chudmobile?

The important thing here is that you are awful people. I'm saying that based on the lack of morals, empathy, and basic human decency that has become the calling card of American regressives.

stale2002 16 hours ago | parent [-]

> What about all of the violence from those awful leftists

If you actually care, which I doubt you do, there have been studies measuring the total damage done during many left wing riots.

For just one example the total cost for the riots that happened between May 26 to June 8, 2020, across 20 states was around 1-2 billion dollars, according to reports.

https://www.axios.com/2020/09/16/riots-cost-property-damage

It is riots like those mentioned that I presume this executive order is targeting.

amanaplanacanal 16 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Rioting is already illegal. This order has nothing to do with that. It's about painting his political enemies as terrorists.

Smeevy 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

1-2 billion dollars? Over 2 weeks across 20 states? That's horrible.

January 6th damage was estimated at $2.7 billion dollars by the GAO. That riot (more of an attempted coup) actually was coordinated by actual, tangible right wing extremist groups rather than the shadowy "Antifa" fiction that hides underneath all of your beds.

https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-23-106625.pdf

>It is riots like those mentioned that I presume this executive order is targeting.

You presume? This administration has lost the benefit of any doubt. This is a cabal of shameless liars and they should be denounced at every turn.

This is yet another transparent attempt to circumvent basic American rights and you're defending it like I said something mean about your local sports team.

stale2002 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> That's horrible.

Indeed it is. And any other whataboutisms you bring up doesn't change that.

The topic was about if there was any leftwing violence. Which there has been. 1-2 billion dollars worth in just that time period. Anything else you bring up doesn't erase that.

> I said something mean about your local sports team.

Actually, you seem to be the one who brought up other teams or sides when I stated a true fact. A fact that you haven't disagree with. You tried to downplay this in your original post and you were wrong to do so.

"You brought up this bad thing, oh yeah, well what about this other completely unrelated bad thing that the other team did!" is precisely the team sports thinking that you have engaged in, not me.

Smeevy 14 hours ago | parent [-]

One fun thing about talking with right wing internet commenters is that they don't really have any firm beliefs (protecting pedophiles is okay now, the government can take guns away from some people, etc.) and they love to feign grievance about darn near anything. I've got a little time so I might as well take the bait.

>The topic was about if there was any leftwing violence.

Was it? I mentioned the leftist violence, and absence thereof, in particular circumstances that you ignored. There was a slew of other stuff in there, but the main gist was attempting to counteract the other poster whataboutsing Biden saying that MAGA are awful people which, in turn, caused a whirlwind of hurt feelings that forced them vote in an authoritarian. You ignored that and wanted to review financials about black people rioting, thereby missing the forest for the trees and I should not have bothered to respond. Mea culpa.

>"You brought up this bad thing, oh yeah, well what about this other completely unrelated bad thing that the other team did!" is precisely the team sports thinking that you have engaged in, not me.["]

I hope you are not expecting me to take you seriously. I've been whatabouticized so many times by conservative pearl-clutchers online that it has no effect anymore. Near as I can tell, there's only one "team" here and I ain't on it. It seems to revel in disgusting me.

If you can spend even a second defending this administration running roughshod over our Constitution then I have no interest in your political viewpoint. The best time to have been shaming conservatives was decades ago, but I guess now will have to do. My only hope is that the America Right can rediscover their sense of shame.

stale2002 10 hours ago | parent [-]

> I mentioned the leftist violence, and absence thereof

Yes you did mention this. And it is wrong. As proven by the evidence that I showed you.

> review financials about black people rioting

That actually super racist of you. There was not some overwhelming majority of black people engaging in violence during those riots and I am not sure why you insinuated at such. The demographics of the people rioting were generally about the same as the demographics of relevant location of where the events. As should be expected.

Additionally, the demographics of the more serious revolutionary/anarchist (and sometimes called antifa) type groups tend to be overwhelmingly white.

The more peaceful protest groups that are focused on police reformed tend toward being full of people of color and aren't focused on overthrowing the government and implementing socialism/anarchism/whatever like the revolutionary groups are.

> I've been whatabouticized

I am not sure why you think a stupid fallacy is justified just because there is some other person in the world engaging in the same stupid fallacy.

You have ironically just engaged in the same whataboutism again. In order to justify you engaging in whataboutism, you have once again appealed to "well some other person did it to me!". Team sports once again.

If I were writing a joke about politics and fallacies in which I made fun of this behavior of justifying whataboutisms with a literal whataboutism, it wouldn't even be funny because it would be too over the top and on the nose.

Smeevy 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I've just been called racist and accused of engaging in whataboutism AND tribalism by a Republican online.

That's a bingo, everybody!

throwacct 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm independent, and the $2.7 billion (which is a crazy amount of money) was basically to pay to procecute +1000 rioters.

That is vastly different from burning cities, etc...

Now, I've seen what antifa militants do almost every time they protest, and to be honest, they should have been declared domestic terrorists sooner rather than later. You can protest without having to vandalize/burning buildings, etc.

defrost 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

From the GAO report:

   Over the course of about 7 hours, more than 2,000 protesters entered the U.S. Capitol on January 6, disrupting the peaceful transfer of power and threatening the safety of the Vice President and
members of Congress.

  The attack resulted in assaults on at least 174 police officers, including 114 Capitol Police and 60 D.C. Metropolitan Police Department officers.

  These events led to at least seven deaths and caused about $2.7 billion in estimated costs.
The footnote on the cost estimate reads:

  This amount reflects, among other things, damage to the Capitol building and grounds, estimated costs borne by the Capitol Police, the District of Columbia, and federal agencies, and estimated costs to address security needs and investigations as described in budget and funding requests, appropriations, agency estimates, and other publicly available information.
~ https://www.gao.gov/assets/d23106625.pdf
throwacct 12 hours ago | parent [-]

> These events led to at least seven deaths

Context is everything:

$2.7 billion, where a big part went to:

U.S. Capitol Police (USCP)

Costs: Over $620 million (as reported by GAO).

- Overtime pay for officers during and after the attack. - Mental health services and trauma support for affected personnel. - Recruitment and training of new officers to address staffing shortages. - Enhanced security infrastructure (e.g., fencing, surveillance, communication systems).

Judicial and Prosecution Costs

- Total DOJ Expenditures: Estimated at $100–150 million. - Salaries and overtime for prosecutors, FBI agents, and support staff. - Court operations, including hearings, trials, and detention. - Legal representation for defendants unable to afford counsel.

And if you keep digging, the amount of money spent was basically on human labor and overtime pay.

Now, tell me again how this compares to $2 billion in actual damages to businesses (arson, looting, and vandalism, etc.), with this event being considered the costliest insured civil disorder event in U.S. history?

Smeevy 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I thought it was 1-2 billion dollars.... Are we just sticking with 2 billion now?

Do I hear 3? Anybody?

defrost 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm unable to tell you again given I've not yet made any comparison between the two, merely quoted the relevant passages from the GAO report.

I do note that the damages number you cite has risen from between 1 & 2 to definitely 2 and these damages are associated with a multitude of legitimate peaceful protests that became a magnet for others to stir trouble, loot and riot on a pretext, start gunfights, etc.

It's a clear false equivalence to compare the single Jan 6th event of faction aligned protesters who invaded and damaged a building disrupting a democratic transition to a multitude of other events and locations across a lengthier time frame that involved many factions across the political spectrum including apolitical criminals of opportunity.

Smeevy 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>I'm independent

That's great and I totally believe you. Thumbs up emoji and all that.

>I've seen what antifa militants do almost every time they protest,

Oh my gosh, you were serious. Can you point out the "Antifa militants" to me? How would someone go about training to join the Antifa Elite Guard?

I see there's a whole process to get into the Proud Boys and all sorts of other right wing extremist groups on Facebook, but I'm not quite seeing the path to membership for Antifa. Is it because they're so well organized and funded by billionaires?

throwacct 13 hours ago | parent [-]

This is interesting since I'm from a minority group, don't even know who the Proud Boys are, and even though I told you I'm an independent, you assumed right from the get-go my political affiliation. If antifa is not a group but a rabble of misfits, then this classification won't amount to much, would it?

Smeevy 12 hours ago | parent [-]

The road to authoritarianism is apparently paved with people telling me I'm overreacting.

This classification, just like every other action taken by this administration, is a means to inflict damage on their ever-expanding list of enemies. The great thing about vague nonsense like this Antifa EO is that they can control who is and isn’t defined as Antifa.

With regard to your political affiliation, I honestly do not care. If you want to gabble on about Antifa as if it's a real threat, you might as well just fly the Trump 2028 flag and drop the silly pretense.

seeEllArr 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]