> I mentioned the leftist violence, and absence thereof

Yes you did mention this. And it is wrong. As proven by the evidence that I showed you.

> review financials about black people rioting

That actually super racist of you. There was not some overwhelming majority of black people engaging in violence during those riots and I am not sure why you insinuated at such. The demographics of the people rioting were generally about the same as the demographics of relevant location of where the events. As should be expected.

Additionally, the demographics of the more serious revolutionary/anarchist (and sometimes called antifa) type groups tend to be overwhelmingly white.

The more peaceful protest groups that are focused on police reformed tend toward being full of people of color and aren't focused on overthrowing the government and implementing socialism/anarchism/whatever like the revolutionary groups are.

> I've been whatabouticized

I am not sure why you think a stupid fallacy is justified just because there is some other person in the world engaging in the same stupid fallacy.

You have ironically just engaged in the same whataboutism again. In order to justify you engaging in whataboutism, you have once again appealed to "well some other person did it to me!". Team sports once again.

If I were writing a joke about politics and fallacies in which I made fun of this behavior of justifying whataboutisms with a literal whataboutism, it wouldn't even be funny because it would be too over the top and on the nose.

I've just been called racist and accused of engaging in whataboutism AND tribalism by a Republican online.

That's a bingo, everybody!