▲ | watersb 8 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
macOS Snow Leopard almost adopted ZFS. But a few weeks before release, Sun was acquired by Oracle. It was going to take months of further negotiations to nail it down. Apple-sourced ZFS on macOS was canceled. ZFS had been released by Sun before the Oracle Situation under their MIT-like CDDL. I suppose when Big Tech is involved, they rattle patents at one another until the dust settles with handshakes and payouts all around. I'm speculating here. But I was told that the CDDL was not considered sufficient for Apple to support its own development efforts. ZFS is relatively complicated, but it generally works. At the time, Apple was shipping servers with iSCSI SAN and a GUI comparable to Disk Utility. Really a shame. I was running native ZFS on my Mac Pro that summer. Eventually migrated those pools to Open Solaris and eventually to Linux. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | j45 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ZFS looked promising and capable at the time. Do you have any recommendations for today? It can feel like until there's a bit more clarity or certainty publicly, or personally running multiple backups on different file systems is the default start, which isn't always ideal. I like storage to become, and remain an appliance. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|