| ▲ | FLX1s phone is launched(furilabs.com) |
| 104 points by slau 9 hours ago | 92 comments |
| https://furilabs.com/shop/flx1s/ |
|
| ▲ | hellcow 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The comments here are awful. What happened to “Hacker” news? This is a Linux phone that actually works, running Debian. It has a battery that competes with the runtime of any modern phone. It has a snappy UI and can reliably make calls. Already it’s the best Linux phone in the world, just on that basis. They’re selling it for the same price as the outgoing model despite tons of bullshit tariffs being levied against them. What an achievement! I want a Linux phone that works, and I want to support a world where Linux phones exist and are financially viable to make, therefore I will buy this as my next phone. |
| |
| ▲ | Hamcha 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | My biggest question is if they use Halium/libhybrys at all, something that is hard to figure out from the marketing but their GitHub repos does have hybris-related stuff. That makes it a non-Linux device to me. Hybris breaks a lot of linux stuff that should just work like flatpak, something I found out incredibly quickly when using SailfishOS. I don't think depending on Android drivers and having to run a small android just to access said hardware makes it a "linux phone". Especially when the linux experience is compromised because of it. postmarketOS has no hybris and everything works great, but no device has all the drivers (in fact, no device at all is reported as having a fully functioning camera, let alone everything else) so there isn't a "flagship" device. If I were to overspend on a linux device I want it to actually run Linux, not a handicapped version of it. And even then, why stop at the OS? Why is this overpriced "linux" phone not boast having user-friendly and sustainable things like a replaceable battery (probably because it doesn't?). People in this niche don't want just a Linux phone, they want a phone that respects them. | | |
| ▲ | neilv 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > My biggest question is if they use Halium/libhybrys at all, That would be a showstopper for now, IMHO. Doing it with maintainable open source Linux drivers is the hard part of having a viable device, from everything I've seen. Another concern are that I can't find who the developers are, nor even definitively what country they're based in. (I don't see it on their About Us page, and the GitHub repo contributors are hidden. I saw a reference to Sydney, but unclear.) Also, it would be nice to have the option of a better hardware provenance than a generic whitebox(?) phone from some unidentified manufacturer in China. Even for individual hobbyist users, and certainly for corporate ones. (This is why I'd like hardware options combinations like Purism for the premium device, and a cheaper device that runs the same software but is still from a brand that at least has a reputation to preserve, like Pine64 or (ha) Google.) | | | |
| ▲ | upheaval7276 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I agree with you, and especially identify with the last sentence. However, I’m fed up with Apple and Google, and any alternative that doesn’t tie me to Google and has all functioning hardware and usable 5G or at least LTE with reasonable specs is a major win in my book. I’ve preordered the FLX1s. The FLX1, which is no longer in production, had a replaceable battery, but lack of a replaceable battery or non-pure Linux in an alternative phone certainly isn’t going to keep me chained to Apple or Google. | |
| ▲ | kop316 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > My biggest question is if they use Halium/libhybrys at all From what I have been able to tell, the folks behind Furilabs are also behind Droidian, which is Halium/libhybrys based. Furilabs/FuriOS is the commercial version of it. | |
| ▲ | toasteros an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It uses halium and libhybris. Flatpak apps work perfectly fine on my FLX1. I have no usability issues with the phone at all. | |
| ▲ | stonogo 19 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | > postmarketOS has no hybris and everything works great, but no device has all the drivers this is why halium exists. OEMs don't produce drivers beyond whatever kernel they ship with, so this is an attempt to build a system that leverages the crap they do ship. > why stop at the OS? Because the OS is the only thing you control. The reason the Librem 5 costs so much for a decade-old platform is because they didn't grab a predesigned device from another OEM. Doing everything yourself is going to be the only way to produce a first-class linux phone. |
| |
| ▲ | pkphilip 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | True. This seems like an amazing device especially given the total B.S Google and Apple have been throwing at us. I would buy this in a heartbeat if it were available in my country. | |
| ▲ | christophilus 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Hear hear. I’m excited about this and may get one just to support the cause even though my iPhone 13 mini is still just fine. | |
| ▲ | NaomiLehman 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think just like "Made in the US," a lot of people say they want one, but most really don't, due to either price, hardware, and/or software drawbacks. | |
| ▲ | throwaway74354 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >I want a Linux phone that works That's Jolla C2 or some Sailfish-compatible Xperia 10. Both GNOME Shell in the phone context and Plasma Mobile are evolutionary dead ends. | | |
| ▲ | TheCraiggers 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Both GNOME Shell in the phone context and Plasma Mobile are evolutionary dead ends. That's a hell of a hot take. Could you elaborate on why you think so? | | |
| ▲ | throwaway74354 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Phone UI paradigm isn't as easy as "Let's just scale down the Desktop/Tablet applications". In case of Sailfish OS development history, migration from clunky, but closer to Desktop, Hildon framework of Maemo 5 to purpose-built Qt applications of Maemo/MeeGo Harmattan was obvious quality boost. Same with webOS and UBports: app ecosystem starting from scratch within their corresponding "DE"s. If convergence-style cross-device applications were somewhat easily achievable, that would've happened in the early 2010s (Windows Phone / Windows RT? Ubuntu Touch getting more attention from investors?). It's the same story why Android Tablets suck and iPadOS doesn't, but in other direction. And/or, it's a simple matter of time/money being spent on streamlining the experience. It's not like Sailfish OS is perfect (Qt6 migration is way overdue), but Jolla has already figured out lots of integration details which will become teething problems for Droidian and such. Including, but not limited to VoLTE support. |
|
| |
| ▲ | p_ing 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Already it’s the best Linux phone in the world, That is a vanishingly low bar, apparently. We don't need to praise something just because it is FOSS. With it's quite old hardware and limited software it instantly becomes unattractive for many. | | |
| ▲ | numpad0 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | That was always the challenge for computer phones, to get the phone part of the phone work. There's been many Wi-Fi only PDAs, non-calling data cards for those, non-calling but cellular-enabled ones, etc. before iOS/Android happened. |
| |
| ▲ | dang 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > The comments here are awful. What happened to “Hacker” news? The contrarian dynamic strikes again: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... Your comment is a good example of a corrective post, and the upvotes are deserved, but they get extra energy from this objecting-to-the-objections quality. On the internet, everybody needs something to object to! | | |
| ▲ | bigyabai 20 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > but they get extra energy from this objecting-to-the-objections quality. Should they not? It would be unfair "extra energy" if the comments were fair criticisms, but they're not in the spirit of hacker or entrepreneurial culture. The parent seems to be arguing that most of these comments are entirely ignoring who the product is for to leap to hardware comparisons pre-hoc. And I agree with that conclusion; there is nothing intellectually stimulating or helpful in a discussion about how a dev kit appeals to the broader consumer market. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | CaptainOfCoit 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why do none of the modern phones have a flat back? It's crazy to me that seemingly everyone is jumping on the train to have the camera stick out from the back. I guess the camera lens needs more space, but why not then add some additional material so it's still even? I feel like I'm missing something obvious, do people not put down their phone on flat surfaces or something? |
| |
| ▲ | goda90 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Most people put replaceable cases on that extend past the camera bump, so making it flat isn't necessary for those people. | | |
| ▲ | Aachen 17 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Doesn't that just reinforce that they might as well have made a better device? I'm not a case user but even I agree |
| |
| ▲ | ktosobcy 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This! Just add those 1-2mm and stuff bigger battery in there… (and make it more rugged so most likely no need for additional cover that is even more bulky) | | |
| ▲ | fmajid 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | More than rugged, add some knurling so it doesn't slip out of your hands so easily. | | |
| ▲ | ktosobcy 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | my bad, I meant to say "rigid" not "rugged". probably unpopular opinion but Nokia Lumia had awesome design - they use polycarbons so they case wasn't unpleaseant to touch and had this "rubbery" feelings and was not slippery... | | |
| ▲ | Aachen 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | The Sony 10 vii that launched yesterday for 450€ has a grippy back according to reviewers, and the Fairphone 6 I've found has plastic as well (battery is removable so the back needs to come off reasonably, not like these horrible two-micron glass panes) | |
| ▲ | fmajid 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The problem with most of these soft-touch plastics is they are incompletely polymerized and will eventually disintegrate into a sticky mess you need to strip off to get to the hard plastic they are painted on. Silicone doesn't, but it's seldom used as a coating. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | sneak 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | People prefer thin to flat. It spends more time in a pocket than on a table. People don’t really put their phones down. | | |
| ▲ | CaptainOfCoit 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | But is it really thin if there are parts that are thicker? The "depth" or whatever should be measured where it's thicker, not thinnest. I guess I'm too much of an office worker to get that most people have their phones in their pocket, as soon as I sit down at my desk the phone gets placed on the desk. | | |
| ▲ | throwawayben 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I will always have a case that has a cut-out for the camera so it still lays flat and it's otherwise thinner (or the case is thicker and thus more protective) than it would be if the camera didn't stick out slightly |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | xrd an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm excited about this. But it still seems like pixel hardware plus grapheneos is a better option? This is a question. |
| |
| ▲ | mikem170 34 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | At the moment GrapheneOS is better for more people. It's secure, reliable and polished. But in the long run the continued development of Linux phones and getting away from the current duopoly is definitely a good thing. I'm using GrapheneOS now, and will switch to a Linux phone when the basics are nailed down and the price is reasonable. | |
| ▲ | acheron 23 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | “Buying Google products” is never a better option. |
|
|
| ▲ | homarp 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| the FuriPhone FLX1 was A Debian-powered brick that puts GNOME in your back pocket previous discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41839326 |
|
| ▲ | ktosobcy 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Hmm... great to see another linux phone but... why on earth they are so vague about the OS? Not to mention no screenshots of the UI... Also - not so sold on the privacy switches… |
|
| ▲ | simjnd 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| New Linux phone drops Looks inside Still the good old A76 and A55 cores (they're 8 years old at this point) |
| |
| ▲ | numpad0 29 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | That used to mean couple SI prefixes worse than current gen processors, which was why old equalled useless. Not anymore, so okay. | |
| ▲ | spaqin 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As much as I admire the FOSS nature, it's always the problem of underspeccing and overpricing the tech at the same time. | | |
| ▲ | hackrmn 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | And don't forget _overdimensioning_. Vendors love this because volume scales cubically with increase in any one of width, height and depth -- they're not the ones carrying the phone, but they can pack more features into one, quite literally. FOSS vendors more so since they need more ground to compete on (hardware being older and price being high enough because of economy of scale). | |
| ▲ | marcos100 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | No economies of scale. Niche things will always be more expensive. | |
| ▲ | varispeed 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you are small, there is no way around it if you want to grow. "overpricing" is often higher cost of parts at lower quantity, future R&D and other costs that are much higher than for big corporation. |
| |
| ▲ | jauntywundrkind 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | 2x A78 + 6x A55? G68 MC4 GPU. It's not great but should be pretty usable, spec wise! | |
| ▲ | righthand 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You’re expecting cutting edge tech in something that gets no financial backing to make it practical? That doesn’t seem fair. | | |
| ▲ | simjnd 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | What is even more unfair is you making me say something I did not say. Extremely sad that nuance is no longer a part of this world. | | |
| ▲ | righthand 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | simjnd 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This is not on me. You chose to interpret that me pointing out the hardware is 8 years old meant I expected cutting edge technology, as if there wasn't 8 years oh hardware innovations in-between the hardware used and "cutting-edge technology". (The A720 and A510 are 4 years old, not exactly cutting-edge but would be a dramatic improvement) There was nothing to extrapolate. I made a remark on the hardware, and you chose to view the world as black and white ("if he mentions the old age of the hardware he must necessarily expect the brand new cutting edge hardware and must not realize that small indie FOSS projects don't have the same resources as Apple"). You lacked nuance, it is not on me. | | |
| ▲ | righthand 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don’t lack nuance because other commenters made the same mistake. In which case your comment is disingenuous at best. > As much as I admire the FOSS nature, it's always the problem of underspeccing and overpricing the tech at the same time. > Laughs in iPhone ;-) Both those comments refer to that exact topic, yet you chose to single me out. | | |
| ▲ | simjnd 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Because both comments you quoted did not put words in my mouth like you did. They can laugh in iPhone all they want, they didn't say I expected iPhone performance out of this Linux phone. Same for the other comment, they're expressing their opinions, not projecting it on me. You're the one being disingenuous, and I'm done exchanging with you. | | |
| ▲ | righthand 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Ah I see, makes sense. We’ll talk again when you purchase a Linux phone device and have something to add beyond the obvious component spec talk. So it’s okay to reply to nuance with more nuance but if I specifically point out what you might be referring to then I’m a monster because I didn’t have the supreme intelligence to respond to snark with more snark? Got it. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | arp242 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | yonatan8070 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > 6.7" 1600x720 It's probably usable, but dips down below what even extra-cheap Xiaomis and such offer. I really want to see a Linux phone's specsheet that's even a little competitive. |
| |
| ▲ | Aachen 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I've always considered it a benefit if they don't spend needless money and waste my battery life on rendering more pixels than I'll ever see. My eyesight hasn't gotten better and as a teenager the 720p pixel density of the phablet called Galaxy Note 2 was already smaller than I can make out during normal use (i.e. not if I'm actively trying to see if I can make them out) But sure, higher number sells better, no matter if this actually makes any difference to anyone |
|
|
| ▲ | hackrmn 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why do they keep making them BIGGER and BIGGER? Our hands don't grow that fast, most adult males have been struggling using their phone with one hand. Only the vocal minority prefers to oversized phone-computer, most of us just want to use it briefly on the go before tucking it back into the pocket, without it tearing a hole in it (which my last two phones have done). If anyone is listening -- can you put a cap on the dimensions? 5.5" screen is plenty, if I want the cinema experience I will either a) go to cinema or b) use some VR/AR device, for the rest of use cases, like watching a movie on a bus/plane/train, it doesn't weigh up against carrying a brick with you. |
| |
| ▲ | Filligree 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Do smaller phones still exist? Genuinely asking. I’m on iPhone, which hasn’t changed form factor in quite a while. | | | |
| ▲ | marcos100 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | And can you give a number on the "vocal minority"? Because companies usually sell what customers want and if the majority of the phones on the market is big, then that's what people want. | | |
| ▲ | numpad0 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | The problem isn't that this hypothetical vocal minority is completely imaginary, but that consumers will repeatably gravitate toward the biggest and most glitterliest product. Only few realizes it's not what they want. | |
| ▲ | vitro 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Hmm, or they fabricate the demand so they can fulfill it. SUVs anyone? | | |
| ▲ | GCUMstlyHarmls 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | As an outsider, how do they do that? I am guessing - put best specs in largest devices (fomo-ish, status symbol)
- put highest cost on largest devices (status symbol)
- um? not even create smaller devices would also do it I guess? | | |
| ▲ | FridgeSeal 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | I mean, the suv case is easy: - market SUV’s. - stock dealerships with mostly SUV’s - complain that nobody is buying non-SUV’s (they can’t, it’s only suv stock), - stop selling non-SUV models. - complete transformation into indeterminate, indistinguishable car brand no.3564. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | LorenDB 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I like large screens because I value having plenty of context visible, e.g. in a webpage or a conversation. Also, don't forget the bigger batteries that large phones enable. | |
| ▲ | jsheard 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | They did try bringing back smaller ~5.5" phones, and hardly anybody bought them. https://www.tomsguide.com/news/iphone-12-mini-sales-a-disast... https://www.macrumors.com/2022/04/21/iphone-13-mini-unpopula... I think the vocal minority is the other way around. | | |
| ▲ | pitched 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | As the article points out, the iPhone 13 mini sold half as much as the other iPhone 13 models, while competing with the iPhone SE which was the same size at half the price. That isn’t exactly terrible. |
| |
| ▲ | chpatrick 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Poorly optimized apps need big batteries. |
|
|
| ▲ | notRobot 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Product info: https://web.archive.org/web/20250920071806/https://furilabs.... |
|
| ▲ | greyw 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Looks interesting. Posh is a bit too adventurous for me (I wish there was a smartphone running FOSS android out of the box) |
| |
|
| ▲ | kelvinjps 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why Ubuntu touch, it was discontinued right? |
| |
| ▲ | CaptainOfCoit 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | It says "The FLX1s from Furi Labs runs a fully optimized Linux system called FuriOS", never heard of FuriOS but seems they're not using Ubuntu Touch, at the very most it's a fork of it. |
|
|
| ▲ | p_ing 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Straight up ripped off Apple's App Store icon. The radio button & battery icon look vaguely similar, perhaps identical. Are there screenshots of the OS? "FuriOS"? Furry indeed. |
|
| ▲ | nunobrito 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The website is down from all the visitors at the moment. Anyone here can share their experience with the phone? |
|
| ▲ | imiric 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As much as I'm interested in running Linux on my next mobile device, I'm not inclined to trust a single company to provide both the device and the OS. I have no reason to distrust Furi Labs, but trust is earned, not granted. First of all, why is there so little documentation about "FuriOS"? What exactly has Furi Labs changed from the base Debian system to warrant a rebadging? Why can't I know which software it's using? Why are there so few screenshots and videos of the device (besides from the "volunteered" reviews)? I understand that selling hardware is how they recoup their development costs, and focusing on a single device allows them to deliver a better user experience. But I would still like to try their OS on a device I may already have, before I decide to shell out $550 for, frankly, pretty lackluster hardware. |
|
| ▲ | deafpolygon 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://www.topcpu.net/en/cpu-c/mediatek-dimensity-900-vs-ap... 1/3 to 1/2 of the performance of an Apple A18. |
| |
|
| ▲ | oncallthrow 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Furi is such a dreadful name |
|
| ▲ | OccamsMirror 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Hug of death :( |
| |
| ▲ | taminka 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | how does that happen btw? like it's understandable when a website is hosted on a vape (lol), but even a cheap vps should be able to handle like 10-20k views in the span of a couple hours (which is the max load from HN i'm assuming), unless you're hosting video or some such | | |
| ▲ | RALaBarge 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It depends! You can make a website with a static text file or you can make a video run as the background. There are more ways to mess it up than to get it right, actually. | |
| ▲ | kouteiheika 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > how does that happen btw? People write their sites in slow languages "because it's I/O bound anyway" and put content which could easily be static in a DB. | | |
| ▲ | Filligree 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | A slow DB. If you were to use Redis as a backing store… Then you’d almost certainly be overcomplicating things, but it shouldn’t be slow. | |
| ▲ | kelvinjps 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Slow? But this site should have been written in just html and CSS |
| |
| ▲ | tazjin 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Serve even statical pages with direct DB access on every hit, using some slow and bloated JS/Python backend, and voila. | | |
| ▲ | Aachen a minute ago | parent [-] | | I use a blog that does three 'direct' (do you mean synchronous?) database queries for every pageview. Language was PHP5 (I feel like 7 got a lot faster but didn't do benchmarks so idk). Renders in about 35 milliseconds on 2001 (sic) hardware iirc, and the HN homepage is very comfortably under 10 requests per second, so it's idling most of the time. Database queries and interpreted languages aren't an issue at all. You need to be majorly unprepared to not be able to handle HN load. What I think people might overlook is that there will be other news outlets and social media that link to their website also. So it's hard to pass a verdict, though someone mentioned it's WordPress in a sibling comment so... I'd put my money on that it's poorly optimised but we can't really know I guess |
| |
| ▲ | p_ing 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's a WordPress site. | |
| ▲ | sneak 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Static sites are not that popular, generally speaking. Anyone competent can put a static site up on CF pages or even a lame VPS and serve huge amounts of traffic just fine. That’s not what they do. |
| |
| ▲ | yorwba 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | https://web.archive.org/web/20250920113525/https://furilabs.... | | | |
| ▲ | eps 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Seems to be working fine. | | |
|