▲ | callmeal 4 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>government budgets should increase monotonically Well, they should track population growth. You cannot effectively serve a larger population with the same resources, otherwise we would continue to have two lane freeways everywhere. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | throw10920 4 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Here we have the "stupid" bit of my reference. No, the budget should not track population growth, because improved technology means that occasionally the cost to provide the same service to an individual decreases, whereupon the budget should also decrease. Or, for instance, a military threat or other transient event (eg COVID) that necessitated temporarily elevated funding levels expires, and the budget should decrease accordingly. The converse being, of course, that sometimes transient events or large shifts (eg increase in costs of materials used to make some important good that the government procures) make things cost more, and so the budget should increase in proportion to those beyond population growth. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|