▲ | ricardobeat 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
> someone else’s work It is not “their” work anymore (IP rights discussions aside) once they published with an unrestricted license. That’s the point. You do it expecting nothing in return, and do it willingly. Expecting “fairness” is a misunderstanding of the whole spirit of it. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | brookst 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Semantic games with “their work”. An artist who sells a painting can still call it their work, even if someone else owns it. And I suppose the collector who bought it could also call it their work, though that phrasing isn’t usually used. It comes about because “work” is overloaded to mean both the activity of creating and the product/result of that activity. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | sarchertech 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
>expecting nothing in return Let’s ignore that no one contributes to open source expecting nothing in return. I can help someone out expecting nothing in return. Then if my situation changes and I need help, but they look at me and say “sorry your help was a gift so I’m not going to return the favor even though I can”. That person is a dick. The problem is you are taking the act of applying a permissive license as some kind of ceremony that severs open source software from all normal human ideas of fairness. You may view it that way. Most people don’t. It’s perfectly reasonable to put something out in the world for other people to enjoy and use. And yet still think that if someone makes a billion dollars of it and doesn’t return anything they are displaying bad manners. | |||||||||||||||||
|