Remix.run Logo
fxtentacle 4 days ago

Except that a few weeks ago, I got a phone call

- from a number with no results on Kagi search

- claiming to be the online banking support of my bank

- asking me to read them a code sent to me via SMS

and when I refused to do that, they blocked my login credentials for online banking and sent me a sternly worded (paper) letter that my account could not be upgraded automatically for their software system migration because I had refused to engage with their support agent.

I then had to create a new login in their app, call the phone number on their letter and read that guy the SMS code and, to my surprise, that was the only !!! authentication needed to activate the new login credentials that I had just created.

(BTW, this was one of the top 100 largest banks worldwide)

It's almost like some companies are training you to fall for scams.

EDIT: This specific instance was Deutsche, but Chase has the exact same horrible habit of calling and then asking for an OTP code.

apparent 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

I've gotten calls from my bank before, where they tried to get me to authenticate after I answered the phone. I said "look, you called me, I'd be crazy to just answer the phone and give out personal info." They refused to provide any info that I could have used to validate that they were legit (like telling me something about my account number, when my account was created, etc.). They said I had to authenticate with them before they would tell me anything.

Sometimes the rep is understanding, and acknowledges that he would have the same reaction, but other times it's like they don't realize they're asking their customers to do something Very Stupid™.

red369 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Over a decade ago, I worked in a bank call centre, first as one of the people who would occasionally make those outbound calls and have those crazy conversations, and then later in their customer experience team. It was well known that those outbound calls to customers were a mess, but it was thought of as tricky to fix. The dilemma was that the risk department felt they needed to identify people, but not only were those people often hesitant to provide any info, we wanted them to be - for everyone else who called them, but not for us.

It was also difficult that when people asked whether they could call back, we encouraged them to, but couldn't guarantee they'd then speak to the same person. They'd need to just talk to whoever they got. That was usually enough to put the person off and they would just take the risk (unfortunately).

Edit: Just wanted to add that I personally didn't want the people to make an exception to their unknown caller scepticism. Perhaps this bugged me more than others, but I would strongly encourage them to call back, and then do my best to get the call-back transferred to me. For that and many other reasons which I like to think of as preferring quality over quantity, my stats were as bad as you'd imagine!

When that bank did really try to tackle this issue, they quickly realised that there was more than one level of risk, and for the vast majority of the calls, we could get by with very little of that customer verification process - basically just that we had called them on a number they had provided, and they stated their name (which I think was more as a recorded verification that they were at least stating they were the correct person). For the much smaller number of outbound calls with more risk, we could then ask the person to call back. Once the risk peeps were on board, it was vastly improved fairly easily.

I'm not in that space at all now, but it seems far easier than it was back then. A few banks I'm a customer of send notifications right into the online banking app, which the customer approves, confirming that they at least have access to that. I don't know what they do if you don't have the app installed. I do find it a little sad that it is yet another thing pushing you to need a smartphone (and to install yet another app). On the other hand, I think all of those banks require me to have the app to use as an authentication token to do any kind of online banking even on a desktop browser, so if you're going to do that, may as well take advantage of it everywhere.

ww520 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It happened with Schwab. I've enabled option trading in one of my accounts and got a call from Schwab, asking to authenticate me. I told them I couldn't trust it's a legit call; give me a number and case number and I'd call back.

kevin_thibedeau 4 days ago | parent [-]

It gets fun being on a 3-way call with bank M, talking to a Schwab rep for verification and trying to explain why Schwab uses a Chase account number.

jagged-chisel 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> … I had to authenticate with them before they would tell me anything.

Sensible. But this whole “we called you now prove to us who you are” mess is stupid.

“Hey, this is Carol from Le Bank. Please just give us a call back at our main number found in the app or on our website. Then you can reach me directly at extension 123.”

gcr 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Which bank was this? Please name them so I can avoid doing business

fxtentacle 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

https://www.deutsche-bank.de/ub/kontakt-und-service/service/...

"New online banking and new app

From 25 August 2025, you will benefit from the upgrade for online banking and Deutsche Bank app.

[..]

From 25 August, you will be able to simply reset your PIN yourself.

[..]

after logging in, you can also see accounts for which you are an authorised signatory."

But out of fairness, let me just mention that Chase behaves the same way. I think all of them just don't really care about small- and medium-sized businesses.

anonymousiam 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I've had this same issue with BECU (Boeing Employee's Federal Credit Union). They're a really good financial institution, but like many, they suffer from nearsightedness. They know that they're "the good guys", so they feel that it's unnecessary for them to properly authenticate themselves to you. So it's asymmetrical security and asymmetrical trust.

The worst part of this (for BECU) is that they've been warning their customers about phishing attacks from entities claiming to be BECU.

dec0dedab0de 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My old insurance company (Cigna) used to call me and demand information to verify it was me. I eventually figured out it was a thing to try to convince me into getting cheaper cancer treatment so they could save money.

danielktdoranie 4 days ago | parent [-]

Jesus, insurance companies are so gross

rightbyte 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Ye. I called my bank to unblock my Mastercard after they blocked it due to Blizzard charging 10USD or something for Star Craft. I just told them my name and they unblocked it.

On another occasion the bank called me regarding my house insurance and asked me to identify myself with their dongle.

Like, there is a wonder I have any money at all in my account. But then again, giving away plastic cards with a magic number on that you gave to strangers for them to withdraw an amount of their choosing from your account was the norm for decades ...

Maybe the wisdom is "Security through no security"?

Arrowmaster a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I had this happen with fucking Google.

I called them about my Fitbit warranty and the rep needed to verify my account and wanted me to give him the code from SMS that explicitly said in the SMS not to give it to anyone!

No my account did not get hacked afterwards. Yes it was a legit service rep because afterwards he was able to pull up info on my previous warranty claim.

brewdad 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I had to call Chase about an issue with my credit card. I called them and knew I was talking to a legit agent. At least as sure as one can ever be. Still, at one point she asked me to read back the code she texted me. I started to do so then stopped. I explained that the text she sent me specifically states "We will never ask you for this number (over the phone". I refused to read it back since it violated their own stated policy.

She had to do some additional work to resolve my issue but it did get fixed.

john_the_writer 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My local medical clinic sent me an sms with a link, asking me to change my medical info. I called them to point out how they were training their patients to fall for sms scamms.

zeven7 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

At my (very large) bank, they have asked me to read them a code from text that literally said "Do not share this code with anyone over the phone" in the text message next to the code. I'm 100% sure it was my bank asking for the code. I called them from a number I found on their site over HTTPS and verified from another source, they knew my account information. I gave it to them while telling them they need to fix this. This was a few years ago. Nothing bad ever happened. Just bad security practices.

Pesthuf 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Did the OTP message they sent you state that this code was specifically to authenticate on the phone?

If it did and even included details like the person‘s name, that would make me feel safe. If it’s a generic OTP that could be used to log into my account or reset its password, though…

jlarocco 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I know Wells Fargo gets a bad wrap (and rightly so) for some of their behavior, but IME they've always had their stuff together with online access and banking.

a4isms 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

For future reference: https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/usage-bad-rap-vs-bad...

0xffff2 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

This is the same Wells Fargo that silently truncated everyone's online banking passwords?

Edit: My bad, I misremembered. It wasn't that they truncated them, it was that they were case insensitive. Which is... objectively worse.

4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
joshuamorton 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, I've also had wells fargo require me to read codes that were emailed back to them, and while this was mitigated by me calling them, it sketched me out every time I had to do it.

carlosjobim 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They treat you as you deserved to be treated: As a serf. You let them stomp all over you and still come crawling back to plead with them to let you bank with them. Even though there's hundreds of banks you can switch to.

If anything even remotely similar happened to me, I'll instantly close all accounts and move my business to another bank.

ryandrake 4 days ago | parent [-]

Same. Find a different bank not full of morons. It's not like there's a shortage of banks out there.

4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
UltraSane 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They should really send the code in a letter.

thrtythreeforty 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I mean just get a new bank at that point. They're telegraphing that they're gonna cause you more inconvenience in the future.

mandeepj 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

At least, you took the right steps. However, they were stupid to begin with.

andy99 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The bank's policies and those like it are the root cause of these scams. There are countless things like this where real "legit" behavior is completely indistinguishable or sometimes even worse than scams.

There will always be people that are "wallet inspector" stupid that you can't really shield from scams. But common sense practices and consistent messaging would solve a lot of the problem. There needs to be better accountability for companies that have these insecure practices. The same way they'd be held accountable for a data breach. Oh, wait...

golem14 4 days ago | parent [-]

This seems obligatory: Identity Theft, by Michell and Webb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9ptA3Ya9E

mvdtnz 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Change banks.

tartoran 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Can you name the bank?

4 days ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]