▲ | smokedetector1 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Interesting. However just because this is true right now doesn't mean it will be true going forward. Unique to the current moment is that there are simultaneously (1) high interest rates and a challenging economy (2) a narrative that AI adoption should enable cutting junior roles. This could lead to companies that would anyway be doing layoffs choosing to lay off or not hire juniors, and replace with AI adoption. To really test the implied theory that using AI enables cutting junior hiring, we need to see it in a better economy, in otherwise growing companies, or with some kind of control (though not sure how this would really be possible). | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | greyb 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
>Unique to the current moment is that there are simultaneously (1) high interest rates and a challenging economy (2) a narrative that AI adoption should enable cutting junior roles. I'm not disputing your point, but I'm curious: given that the main headline measures that we tend to see about the US economy right now involve the labour market. How do you establish the counterfactual? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | dboreham 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rates are not high. High-er than the post 2008 era yes. Not historically high though. | |||||||||||||||||
|