Remix.run Logo
Bullfight2Cond 2 days ago

That's a very self-limiting viewpoint when a significant portion of warfare is deception, so by definition you're not going to get "all we know".

For example, Seymour Hersh (renowned wartime investigative journalist), published a brief on US involvement: https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the...

nradov 2 days ago | parent [-]

That article has been thoroughly debunked. Seymour Hersh just made things up with no fact checking or hard evidence.

Bullfight2Cond 2 days ago | parent [-]

What's your counter evidence?

nradov 2 days ago | parent [-]

No counter evidence is needed because Hersh hasn't actually presented any legitimate evidence in the first place.

normalaccess 2 days ago | parent [-]

If 'no counter-evidence is needed' were valid, we could dismiss anything we don't like without argument.

AKA: Argument from ignorance