That article has been thoroughly debunked. Seymour Hersh just made things up with no fact checking or hard evidence.

What's your counter evidence?

No counter evidence is needed because Hersh hasn't actually presented any legitimate evidence in the first place.

	▲	normalaccess 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		If 'no counter-evidence is needed' were valid, we could dismiss anything we don't like without argument. AKA: Argument from ignorance