▲ | szopa 10 hours ago | |
One consideration that that is missing: how familiar are LLMs with this technology? And from this point of view the app has sailed, I’m afraid we are stuck with the frameworks that are available today for eternity, for better or worse. And maybe that is not such a bad thing. I don’t do full stack programming in my day job, but I have this crazy idea that if I ever have a startup idea, I want to be able to code an MVP. So, every two years I do a deep dive and write a toy web app. I’m always learning something new on the frontend (fun!), while on the backend I just use Django, so it just works as it used to, except it usually gets more convenient in many small ways (boring). Sometimes there’s such a thing as too much fun. | ||
▲ | balamatom 10 hours ago | parent [-] | |
>how familiar are LLMs with this technology? Evil people claim the technology has been promoted entirely for the sake of clearing the ways for LLMs, as it makes more sense from the "perspective" of an ANN than from the perspective of any given human developer. In a biased Turing test like that, of course the LLM is going to be more proficient than a junior. The junior is slowed down by their vestigial expectation that these very popular tools by very large groups of very smart people actually make sense. |