▲ | demarq a day ago | |||||||||||||
Controversial take here. Sue your customer. No really. Banks operate on risk, make chargebacks risky. Some of these chargebacks sound like straight up fraud. Three months of usage and using their bank to reverse a payment. Make Fraud Spicy Again | ||||||||||||||
▲ | greyb a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Suing for $43 would absolutely be frivolous and would be thrown out by all but the most bored small claims courts. The best you could do is send your client to collections, though if you try and mess with their credit report, that incurs liability on your part. Funny enough, German companies do send SaaS/IaaS clients with small bills owing to collections, even for amounts as small as 15-20 EUR. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | Spivak a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
The problem is that chargebacks are like the perk of using a CC for transactions. So if companies start doing this to an any degree that makes CC customers hesitant to use the CC's customer protection feature they will find a way to make it the merchant's problem again. The best you can really do is be large enough that cutting ties with your business entirely isn't feasible for the customer. |