▲ | greyb a day ago | |
Suing for $43 would absolutely be frivolous and would be thrown out by all but the most bored small claims courts. The best you could do is send your client to collections, though if you try and mess with their credit report, that incurs liability on your part. Funny enough, German companies do send SaaS/IaaS clients with small bills owing to collections, even for amounts as small as 15-20 EUR. | ||
▲ | qhwudbebd 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
UK perspective here: I've not claimed for $43, but I've used the small claims process to recover £65. They replied to the paperwork sent out by the court indicating they intended to defend it, so I paid the hearing fee to take it to court, where the judge was polite, helpful, very switched-on, and didn't seem remotely annoyed by the size of the claim. The total costs of making the claim were more than the amount I'd claimed, but I'd been careful to provide all the proper notice and offer to settle for the amount of the claim, so they were awarded against the defaulting client. It was great fun and I think it would have been fun and educational even if I'd lost. Would definitely do it again. | ||
▲ | evermike a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Of course we would never do anything like that. In the post I just shared two different cases to give some perspective to the community. From everything discussed in the article, there are a 2 major takeaways: 1) You need to avoid chargebacks as much as possible. 2) If a chargeback does happen, the chances of winning are basically zero — unless you can convince the customer to withdraw it. |