Remix.run Logo
wrs a day ago

We can only hope this administration and its supporters are a temporary aberration that the US can claw its way back out of. Otherwise, that classic advice to sign up your kids for Mandarin class starts to sound pretty good.

windowshopping a day ago | parent | next [-]

Why would moving to an even more authoritarian country be good advice? What?

wrs 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Because if you want to get a good science education, you need to be in a place that supports science and education. The administration has disrupted the system that made the US the world scientific leader, a status it’s had only since the mid-20th century, which it achieved through concerted government and social investment. Which country is doing that right now?

In 1930, if you wanted access to the great science universities and literature, you learned German. Things can change. Quickly.

contrarian1234 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

B/c the next Carnegie Mellon will be there

XorNot a day ago | parent | prev [-]

The point is you'll be doing business in high technology with China, not America. Helps to speak the language when you negotiate.

phamtrongthang 19 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I find this quite true in my field. Recently I attended the biggest conference in computer vision (CVPR), and almost half the time I was there, I heard Chinese instead of English. Most people I met joked that we should learn Mandarin if we want to continue doing AI research now.

umanwizard a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

America isn’t the only place that speaks English. It’s the global standard language. When a Japanese and a Chinese person negotiate they are already using English.

jfaat 21 hours ago | parent [-]

That is a wild claim

stickfigure 20 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> That is a wild claim

It is not.

The vast majority of English speakers do not live in the US or the UK. English is the most widely spoken language in the world. If you are at dinner with people from several countries, the "Lingua Franca" will almost certainly be English.

The popularity of Mandarin relies on the sheer mass of native speakers in China. That population is shrinking and that shrinking is expected to accelerate. The cultural export of China is inherently limited by its ideology - there's a reason we have (had, really) "Hong Kong Cinema" not "Peking Cinema".

umanwizard 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Which part?

jfaat 21 hours ago | parent [-]

"When a Japanese and a Chinese person negotiate they are already using English"

umanwizard 20 hours ago | parent [-]

What language do you think they use?

All Japanese people learn English at school; few learn Chinese as you can verify by reading about the Japanese school system from various sources including Wikipedia.

Similarly in China, English is the only mandatory foreign language taught at school.

jfaat 19 hours ago | parent [-]

> What language do you think they use?

Frequently, Chinese or Japanese. For example companies in these countries employ translators. Are you suggesting they rely on primary school-level English to negotiate?

const_cast 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Other countries have competent language programs, the US is pretty unique in having unbelievably shit education in foreign languages.

That is to say, I would not be surprised if, in China, people are quiet fluent in English.

umanwizard 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Who says they only study it in primary school?

jfaat 18 hours ago | parent [-]

You claimed, without a source other than wikipedia, that everyone in Japan learns English in school. I see this [0] on wikipedia which says "a select number of public primary schools ... have mandatory English classes"

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English-language_education_in_...

umanwizard 10 hours ago | parent [-]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Japan#School_subj...

> The following is the set of compulsory subjects currently taught in the Japanese education system from the primary to secondary levels:

> * Foreign languages: English (rarely: Korean, Spanish, Arabic, French, German, or Chinese)

alephnerd a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I disagree with that.

Instead we are seeing increased siloing of scientific domains. The EU is cracking down on EU-Chinese research cooperation (as recent arrests and deportations in France have shown), India still has a de facto freeze on Chinese R&D and China is still enforcing export controls on IP to India, and South Korea and Japan are still controlling any IP generated from their industrial research fusion programs.

We're instead seeing at least 6-7 different scientific and capital ecosystems forming, and with collaboration being tightly controlled by governments.

wmf 21 hours ago | parent [-]

Assuming that's true... if the largest silo is China I can imagine plenty of people wanting to "defect" to China for their own advancement. But you'll have to speak Chinese.

alephnerd 19 hours ago | parent [-]

Most countries and transnational organizations continue to use English as the primary lingua franca, even despite China becoming a major R&D hub.

The EU continues to use English as the lingua franca for scientific communication due to the diversity within the EU.

On the India side, research done as part of the pact with Japan [0], Taiwan [1], South Korea [2], the EU [3], and the US [4] is done in English.

And on the Vietnam side (based on my SO's experience), all of her ASEAN-Japan and ASEAN-SK collaboration was done in English as well.

[0] - https://www.jst.go.jp/inter/english/project/country/india.ht...

[1] - https://www.iitrpr.ac.in/indo-taiwan/

[2] - https://www.ikst.res.in/ikst-en/index.do

[3] - https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/news/all-resear...

[4] - https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/10/the-us-india-...

jltsiren a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Kids may want to learn Chinese for the same reason they may want to learn Arabic or Spanish. It helps doing business in some parts of the world.

But China is not going to be the dominant superpower (except maybe if they manage to beat the rest of the world in AI). Their labor force is already in decline, which means they must gradually shift their focus from building the future to maintaining the society. Like Europe and Japan are already doing.

_diyar 18 hours ago | parent | next [-]

As opposed to the US, where the labor market will magically start growing net of immigration?

ruszki 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If people don’t want to move to the US, then America will get the same treatment.

conductr a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Just curious, but is there any evidence that Chinese/Indian/etc will even be as open to US students as the US has been to them? I have no knowledge of what their intentions may be, but I think it’s a pretty large assumption that they would even take American students at all

jeffreysmith a day ago | parent | next [-]

American here who went to a Chinese (grad) school for CS and was admitted to every Chinese school I applied to. This is very much a possible route, if you’re appropriately qualified for the program. The main issue is language: outside of HK, programs in English are rare.

contrarian1234 a day ago | parent [-]

That's extremely impressive that you managed to reach such a high level of fluency. I find written and technical Chinese is extremely tricky and different from spoken Chinese

seanmcdirmid a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

PKU and Tisnghua both have overseas student programs and they are particularly eager to have qualified takers. Now, the question is how far does that go when the schools really become popular undergrad and grad STEM studies?

The bigger problem is that schools like MIT, Stanford, UCB, UCI throw (or threw?) lots of resources at students that Chinese schools didn't really do (and maybe still don't? My info is 10 years out of date). Even the lower ranked schools have ample resources and fairly well paying TA/RA-ships available. In China, you would have to work for your professor's side company to get money, and the professor might not let you graduate if you were doing a good job (again, 10 years ago, I have no idea what its like today, China is changing quickly).

AngryData 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I would find it hard to imagine they wouldn't welcome foreign students just for the fact that there are so few in comparison to start with. Even if tons of US kids started going to China for college, they would always remain a tiny fraction of students due to the population size disparity.

alephnerd 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Chinese/Indian/etc will even be as open to US students as the US has been to them

India has been opening campuses abroad like IIT Madras in Tanzania [0] and IIT Delhi in Abu Dhabi [1] to cater specifically to building that kind of relationship in Africa and MENA. The majority of seats allocated (66%) are for foreign nationals.

Top Indian programs like IIT Delhi have been very active giving fellowships and subsidises for students and researchers from ASEAN [2], the African Union [3], Pacific Island nations [4], and Afghanistan [5]

And Vietnam would do similar programs as well for poorer ASEAN nations and a number of African countries (notably Angola and Mozambique) as well as Cuba

Japan has been running a multi-decade long international student and R&D collaboration program that helped jumpstart South Korea and China's R&D capacity in the 1980s and 1990s, along with much of ASEAN's more recently (my SO is a product of that). Same with South Korea as well.

[0] - https://www.iitmz.ac.in/

[1] - https://abudhabi.iitd.ac.in/

[2] - https://asean.iitd.ac.in/

[3] - https://www.itecgoi.in/index

[4] - https://www.itecgoi.in/Sagaramrut

[5] - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-14/india-off...

DrillShopper a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

nneonneo a day ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

dfxm12 a day ago | parent [-]

You mean reactionism. A conservative wants to keep the status quo. A reactionary wants to regress to a previous status quo (i.e. perhaps from 150 years ago).

seanmcdirmid a day ago | parent [-]

Conservation literally means to preserve. Teddy Roosevelt was a conservative who established the national park system to preserve our country's natural wonder. You might also say that conservatives don't believe in spending lots of money and are against high deficits and fiscal craziness. None of those really describe the conservative movement in America today.

hyperhello a day ago | parent | next [-]

That's not what it means in practice. The element being conserved is monarchy.

vintermann 19 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In one of Marx's most memorable letters:

"Tories in England long imagined that they were enthusiastic about monarchy, the church, and the beauties of the old English Constitution, until the day of danger wrung from them the confession that they are enthusiastic only about ground rent."

That feels like it could have been written today, doesn't it? When push comes to shove, things like Christianity, constitutional order or "fiscal restraint" seem to always take second seat to the yield from owning things, especially real estate.

seanmcdirmid 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That has never been an American conservative ideal for obvious reasons.

Geezus_42 19 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah, it's more oligarchal.

thwarted a day ago | parent | prev [-]

The conservative movement today is heavily influenced by religious positions.

12 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]