I disagree with that.

Instead we are seeing increased siloing of scientific domains. The EU is cracking down on EU-Chinese research cooperation (as recent arrests and deportations in France have shown), India still has a de facto freeze on Chinese R&D and China is still enforcing export controls on IP to India, and South Korea and Japan are still controlling any IP generated from their industrial research fusion programs.

We're instead seeing at least 6-7 different scientific and capital ecosystems forming, and with collaboration being tightly controlled by governments.

▲

wmf 21 hours ago | parent [-]

Assuming that's true... if the largest silo is China I can imagine plenty of people wanting to "defect" to China for their own advancement. But you'll have to speak Chinese.

	▲	alephnerd 19 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Most countries and transnational organizations continue to use English as the primary lingua franca, even despite China becoming a major R&D hub. The EU continues to use English as the lingua franca for scientific communication due to the diversity within the EU. On the India side, research done as part of the pact with Japan [0], Taiwan [1], South Korea [2], the EU [3], and the US [4] is done in English. And on the Vietnam side (based on my SO's experience), all of her ASEAN-Japan and ASEAN-SK collaboration was done in English as well. [0] - https://www.jst.go.jp/inter/english/project/country/india.ht... [1] - https://www.iitrpr.ac.in/indo-taiwan/ [2] - https://www.ikst.res.in/ikst-en/index.do [3] - https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/news/all-resear... [4] - https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/10/the-us-india-...