| ▲ | back2dafucha 4 days ago |
| Old news. This has been going on for decades. If you even look badly on youtube you will find corporate videos from "HR Consultants" teaching companies how to bury job listings so noone will be likely to find them. Your country sold you down the river 30 years ago. |
|
| ▲ | cj 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| For those curious, a common method is to publish the job listing in the newspaper classifieds. This is what my old employer did to sponsor the visa for the company’s CTO. Newspapers are used for a surprising number of various public announcements. E.g. in New York you must publish a notice in a newspaper for 6 weeks (or something like that) when establishing a LLC. There’s something to be said for reading the paper even in 2025! Although I suppose the notices are probably also online.. |
| |
| ▲ | jakub_g 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | In Poland a while ago, a basketball club submitted an opening to local labor office, looking for "basketball player with 5 years of NBA experience". Update: source: https://radioszczecin-pl.translate.goog/1,116784,koszykarze-... | | | |
| ▲ | LadyCailin 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | A newspaper of record is in theory something you are “supposed” to continually read, but it’s kind of like saying you’re “supposed” to know all the laws of the land. While probably true, no one actually can or would do that. | |
| ▲ | lazide 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Usually it’s a newspaper in the middle of nowhere too, in fine print, in the classifieds. | |
| ▲ | _heimdall 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I've also seen this done when the hiring manager, or someone else in the process, already has a candidate to hire and needs to post the job listing for legal cover. |
|
|
| ▲ | epolanski 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Your country sold you down the river 30 years ago. Jm2c but I think the harsh truth is that US while having a decently sized population of good software engineers, it is still nowhere near the required amount. Thus, many companies would rather give 150/200k to someone who's actually good at it and will be impressed by that money rather than some half assed US graduate who only went into SE because he wanted a cushy well paying job. |
| |
| ▲ | pempem 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | We could also give them a clear, short path to citizenship if we didn't have enough. Instead we do our best to keep it as chaotic as possible so that those SWE we need can't push for 175/225k | | |
| ▲ | aleph_minus_one 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | >
We could also give them a clear, short path to citizenship if we didn't have enough. The USA currently potentially hasn't enough programmers. If the market tide changes, one of course wants to be able to send these superfluous work migrants back to their home countries. | |
| ▲ | 486sx33 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
| |
| ▲ | chickenzzzzu 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | How about we stop centralizing tech talent around 7 big companies that hire H1Bs, and instead let all companies engage in international (and domestic) exchanges of labor and services? Aka, all software engineers now self organize into small groups funded by independent contracts from larger companies. This solves many, many problems, including where should laborers live, fairness in interviews, etc. | |
| ▲ | cbarrick 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > it is still nowhere near the required amount. How do you reconcile that with all of the SWE layoffs in the past few years? | | |
| ▲ | bubblethink 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Companies are always going to lay people off, because they can and it is in their financial interest to do so when the shareholders or investors demand cutbacks. AFAIK, Amazon even has a formalized stack ranking system where a certain percentage will be laid off every year to make room for new talent. This has nothing to do with visas or immigrants. If you want to stop that, you need better worker protections, but that's a separate discussion. |
| |
| ▲ | Bratmon 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That's an obvious lie. If it were true, companies wouldn't be suing to keep their job postings hidden from American citizens (source: the article) | |
| ▲ | insane_dreamer 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Jm2c but I think the harsh truth is that US while having a decently sized population of good software engineers, it is still nowhere near the required amount. This is not true now, if it ever was (maybe for very short periods); there is tremendous competition for every good SWE job out there, and has been for a long time. | |
| ▲ | marcusverus 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is a sorry excuse. If companies were required to hire American students, they would have a strong incentive to foster the development of American talent. It would not be a problem. > Thus, many companies would rather give 150/200k to someone who's actually good at it and will be impressed by that money rather than some half assed US graduate who only went into SE because he wanted a cushy well paying job. The idea that Americans wouldn't fight tooth and nail for these jobs is just idiotic. | |
| ▲ | _DeadFred_ 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | How dare that loser want a cushy, well paying job. This is America, that's not allowed for them. We like our workers desperate. | | |
| ▲ | DaSHacka 4 days ago | parent [-] | | This, I cannot believe how all the most pro-workers rights people I know also support "open borders"-like philosophies. What do you think is going to happen to your bargaining power as an employee when your employer has an infinite workforce to draw from? | | |
| ▲ | Seattle3503 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > What do you think is going to happen to your bargaining power as an employee when your employer has an infinite workforce to draw from? To assumption that there is a finite amount of work in the economy is called "lump of labour fallacy" in economics. It's not useful to ask "What if X were infinite and we held everything else constant?" | | |
| ▲ | tekknik 3 days ago | parent [-] | | this relates to the economy as a whole, individual industries expand and contract their demand and given the advent of AI we’re in a contraction moment. I vote until the economy stabilizes we terminate H1Bs |
| |
| ▲ | Spivak 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Well yeah, because when you have a much larger working population you have to actually establish rights at the government level or with unions rather than relying on your individual bargaining power. The two philosophies are not only not incompatible but are necessary to maintain our standard of living. Closed borders, protectionism, and relying on individual bargaining power is another path to a similar end so long as you can keep the US on top. | |
| ▲ | almostgotcaught 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > This, I cannot believe how all the most pro-workers rights people I know also support "open borders"-like philosophies. You ever consider that it's because those people are pro-workers everywhere and not just workers nearby? So yes enabling foreign workers to improve their lives by coming here makes perfect sense. > What do you think is going to happen to your bargaining power as an employee when your employer has an infinite workforce to draw from? I mean that's like saying "what do you think is gonna happen to your rights once all the slaves are free". The answer hinges on whether we continue to operate under the government that's comfortable with exploiting its citizens. | | |
| ▲ | tekknik 3 days ago | parent [-] | | > You ever consider that it's because those people are pro-workers everywhere and not just workers nearby? So yes enabling foreign workers to improve their lives by coming here makes perfect sense. so then by doing this they hurt the worker here in favor of a worker in some other country? > I mean that's like saying "what do you think is gonna happen to your rights once all the slaves are free". when the word slave wasn’t mention at all by the parent, how did you conclude anything about slavery? |
| |
| ▲ | 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | buckle8017 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The thing this article didn't mention and the author likely doesn't know is that there's a guide going around instructing people on how to apply for H1B jobs on forums like 4chan. |
| |
| ▲ | exhilaration 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I've got out of work friends that would love to see this guide. Please share. | | |
| ▲ | PyWoody 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Job Listing Site Highlighting H-1B Positions So Americans Can Apply - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44892321 - August 2025 (108 comments) https://jobs.now | |
| ▲ | kccqzy 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is unlikely to be of use to your friends. Companies hide these job openings because they aren't real: they are filled by a real person right now. If someone applies, they won't be hired because there's no extra headcount. They will just be rejected after a resume review. Companies usually don't even extend interviews to such candidates. Applying only delays the green card process of a foreigner since they will need to rewrite a job description to be even more tailored to that already employed person. | | |
| ▲ | lazide 4 days ago | parent [-] | | So…. Locals shouldn’t delay or poison the process for a foreigner that would take ‘their’ role, while bored on unemployment - why exactly? | | |
| ▲ | lazyasciiart 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Locals who are trying to get jobs for themselves shouldn't be told that they can get a job through this process. | | |
| ▲ | lazide 4 days ago | parent [-] | | So you’re admitting that applying for jobs they should be able to get, in a place they should be able to apply in, under federal law is not going to work? Sounds like fraud to me. Or a crime of some sort. If they do it, and it clearly doesn’t work, it even sounds like something they could take to court. In fact, something that is perhaps their duty to take to court. | | |
| ▲ | bubblethink 4 days ago | parent [-] | | You're reading too much into it. It's a case of bad UX. The jobs do not exist. The actual job application/interview etc. happened years ago, when it did exist, and everyone, including locals, had the same shot at it. When the job existed, someone was hired for it, and it happened to be someone on a visa. In order to keep that person employed in this job and get them a green card, the government requires that the job be advertised again afresh. It's a non-sensical requirement that was added because some politican or lobbyist asked for it. The natural way to add protectionism to this model would have been to add it at the outset, but that clearly wouldn't work for the economy. So a compromise was engineered. Companies can hire anyone generally as long as they are, in principle, temporary. When it comes to keeping them permanently, the government requires that they do this charade of posting ads again and doing a market test etc. | | |
| ▲ | lazide 4 days ago | parent [-] | | That is not a UX issue, that is blatant immigration fraud my man. The reason they are required to readvertise is because the visa they are on is for jobs that cannot be filled by a local, so if the job can actually be filled by a local, that person should lose the visa and have to leave (or find another job that supports them being here). That isn’t a technicality, except the prior admins allowed it to be. Does that suck for the person on the visa? Yeah. But guess what, it also sucks for the unemployed locals. So either the gov’t actively throws locals under the bus, or follows the rules. When everything is going up and to the right, or no one can see why they’re struggling, it’s easy to gloss over these ‘small details’. But they’re not so small in reality, eh? | | |
| ▲ | kccqzy 4 days ago | parent [-] | | You do not know enough about immigration and are spewing falsehoods. First, a visa is not permission to stay in the U.S. A foreigner can have an expired visa and a valid status to be in the U.S. (they can take their time at their leisure to apply for one). Conversely they can have an unexpired visa but no permission to be in the U.S. (such as when they have a H-1B visa but is actually unemployed for a long time). Second, this entire process of advertising fake job openings is not at all related to visas, H-1B or not. It's related to the employment based green card process. Hiring an H-1B requires a Labor Condition Application from Department of Labor, not a Permanent Labor Certification. The former does not require any attempt to hire American workers. Third, even if some Americans apply for these fake job openings, that doesn't mean that foreigner must leave. After all, the foreigner still has valid H-1B status (see first point). It's a setback to their green card process only. Fourth, whether or not the job can be filled by a local is determined by the company. Sure such determination will need to be submitted to the government for approval. Imagine that the company requires 10 years of experience with Ruby but the local has 9 years of experience. Guess whether the company will see this local as qualified? There's no good way to solve this problem. Companies can require whatever skill and experience they want in their job requirements. The government doesn't determine whether the job requirement itself is sensible. It just checks that no locals satisfy the job requirement. Do you get the point now? Companies can construct the job requirement however they want such that the job cannot be filled by a local. Companies are not abusing any law. Companies are exercising their right to choose qualifications for the jobs. Fifth, you say "sucks for the unemployed locals" but there is no requirement for companies to check that the local applying is currently unemployed. This is not a joblessness reduction program. Maybe the locals who are applying are just switching jobs, in which case if they succeed their old employer loses a headcount. There's no net change in employment figures. The law doesn't care. Next time before you spew falsehoods on HN, spend an afternoon learning about H-1B, LCA, PERM, EB-1, EB-2 and such topics. Before you accuse companies of committing fraud, consider whether the law actually allows what the companies are doing and whether it is the law that should be changed. Considering directing your anger from prior administrations to Congress instead. | | |
| ▲ | lazide 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I likely know far, far more about this process than you. Including currently having
‘Right to work’ in 3 hemispheres on this planet, 2 from visas from various governments. I’ve hired dozens of people in the US under H1B’s, married someone on a green card, etc. Companies are, and have been, clearly abusing the law in the US for decades. It’s only ramped up over the years and has gotten quite absurd. I have many friends on H1Bs, and am quite familiar with what is going on recently too. Just because prior admins have been ignoring illegal behavior doesn’t mean it is actually legal. It just means the party is over, eh? | |
| ▲ | joquarky 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You're talking in ideals, while others are talking praxis. | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | buckle8017 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Unfortunately they will not hire Americans even if they're qualified because what they really want are slaves. With H1B fired means deported. The people following the guide are just making it impossible to review all of the applications. |
| |
| ▲ | y-curious 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | So what if it comes from 4chan? I think it's a good thing for citizens to try and get jobs that should be going to them, no matter the source | | | |
| ▲ | mirrorsaurus 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
|
|
| ▲ | veunes 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The frustrating part is that this isn't some loophole getting accidentally exploited, it's baked into the system |
|
| ▲ | jakub_g 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Semi-related: reminds me of reports that public tenders in Russia had to be submitted into a central portal according to law, but to prevent anyone from finding them, various Unicode tricks would be applied to the document to replace characters and prevent effective searching. |
|
| ▲ | alephnerd 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [flagged] |
| |
| ▲ | tomhow 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Please don't post in an inflammatory style or make swipes at the HN community. We don't know what "a large portion of HNers" think about any topic. Controversial topics bring out the people who feel the strongest about that topic, but the people commenting are only a tiny share of the whole community. Your point about the different reactions people have to different kinds of immigration controversies is valid, but topics like this need to be discussed with sensitivity. Please take care to observe the guidelines when commenting here, especially these ones: Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes. Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive. Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community. Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | | |
| ▲ | alephnerd 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I understand, but why is similar moderation not extended when "H1Bs" come up on HN? To be brutally honesty, why is it acceptable to bash H1B abuse but not B1/2 or VWP abuse on HN. In both cases, it is employers mislabeling and potentially breaking immigration and labor laws, yet it is acceptable to talk derogatorily about those on H1Bs and not on other visas, even though rates of visa misuse are consistent across most large nationalities. I am of South Asian origin, but I have lived in North America for almost my entire life (aside from 6 months in the old country), but the persistent utilization of "H1B" as a code word for South Asian (primarily Indian) origin tech employees is tiring. I understand that a lot of ICs are dealing with a significant amount of stress due to the downturn in the tech industry, but there is a nativist current on HN that is starting to morph into anti-South Asian sentiment. This style of thread comes up almost daily on HN, and is something I have previously brought up to @Dang as well. It is tiring and demeaning to those of us who are immigrants or the children of immigrants - a number of us who make up a major portion of the tech industry, and have leadership positions in YC as well. South Asian Americans make up around 2-3% of the US, but almost every post on HN about the job market turns into "H1B"-bashing, which often devolves into bashing people on the visa instead of the companies themselves. Almost never do I see conversations extending sympathy to those on work visas and also stuck with abusive employers - only nativist bashing that "they took our jobs". I hope you can moderate these kinds of conversations or update the engagement rules of HN, because HN and the tech industry of 2025 is not HN or the tech industry of 2008. It is legitimately demoralizing. I worked on the Hill for several years, have advised administrations on how to bring back manufacturing and "American dynamism" (to use the A16Z term), and have built, launched, and funded software products and companies that are used by backbone infra in the US, and even advised a number of YC startups that have exited. I have done my part for the country, yet to a large portion of HN and the tech industry I and other South Asian Americans will continue to be termed as "H1Bs" until they hear our accent, or if we can pass as some other race or ethnicity. I would love to have a good faith discussion with you about this, because I do heavily leverage HN and have found it to be a great resource to find technical discussions and have my portfolio companies show share their features, so the toxicity around H1B and work visas in the tech industry is heavily demoralizing. | | |
| ▲ | tomhow 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Thanks for the thoughtful response. I understand where you're coming from. Our role is not to moderate for or against any "side" in a debate. Our role is to uphold the guidelines, so that anyone with a reasonable position on any topic has fair opportunity to express it. My perception from moderating HN for years is that there is generally much more criticism toward companies (including/especially Silicon Valley companies) for exploiting H1Bs than there has been towards holders of those visas. But if you see evidence that contradicts that (i.e., comments that are unkind towards visa-holders or that discuss them in any way that breaks the guidelines), you can certainly flag them and email us so we can take a look. We can only moderate what we see and there's a lot of stuff that we don't see. If there are patterns or trends of these kinds of comments, then the more you can show us, the better, so we can develop approaches to identifying and dealing with them. | | |
| ▲ | alephnerd 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Thanks for the kinds words and being open to listen to my feedback! > Our role is not to moderate for or against any "side" in a debate. Our role is to uphold the guidelines, so that anyone with a reasonable position on any topic has fair opportunity to express it. Absolutely and no argument there > But if you see evidence that contradicts that (i.e., comments that are unkind towards visa-holders or that discuss them in any way that breaks the guidelines), you can certainly flag them and email us so we can take a look. We can only moderate what we see and there's a lot of stuff that we don't see. I have done so on multiple occasions, but have seen a number of those comments remain up. For example, this comment [0]. Additionally, in this very thread, we have an unsourced comment [1] parroting a common trope, which is legimately false in most cases (and as a member of the YC community, I'm sure you can get this validated), and with significant controversial discussion about this I also see constant mentions of Infosys and TCS, but never mentions of massive European firms like EPAM which do similar shenanigans and advertise it to new hires across the CEE [2] or Globant and LATAM [3]. While the Indian firms are large, and it is acceptable to have not heard about Globant, EPAM is absolutely massive and every F100 uses them. I can provide more robust data on the general trend, but it is something that would take some time, but I would really really appreciate if the YC employees affiliated with HN do a deep dive into this. [0] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45228366 [1] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45224087 [2] - https://www.epam.com/careers/epam-without-borders/usa [3] - https://stayrelevant.globant.com/en/culture/globant-experien... | | |
| |
| ▲ | renlo 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] |
|
| |
| ▲ | cowsandmilk 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | The immigration raid and what was happening at these plants is 100% different…not sure how you can even pretend they are the same. The system they are discussing is one where you’ve already been in the US legally for 6 years. |
|