▲ | cyberax 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A third-party maker literally CAN NOT make their devices work the same way. "Can not" as in "unable because Apple doesn't allow that". All Apple needs to do is whitelist access to certain APIs and provide minimal documentation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | SpicyLemonZest 5 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No, that's not so. One of the relevant rulings (https://ec.europa.eu/competition/digital_markets_act/cases/2...) dictates that merely providing any API isn't enough. Among other requirements, the API must "properly consider the needs of third parties that will make use of the solution", it must be "properly tested for bugs or other shortcomings", and Apple must "provide adequate and timely assistance to third parties that report issues". A barely hacked-together API that's hard to use without constantly pinging the team who implemented it - entirely normal for the first release of a big new feature - wouldn't be enough. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|