Yes, and?

> A barely hacked-together API that's hard to use without constantly pinging the team who implemented it - entirely normal for the first release of a big new feature - wouldn't be enough.

Oh, so Apple can't be bothered to be held to the same standard as, say, automotive developers?

▲

burnerthrow008 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

Ahh, I see the problem. This may come as a shock to you: a phone is not a car.

	▲	cyberax 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, a phone is vastly more important than a personal car right now. You can easily live (especially in Europe) without a car, but a phone is indispensable. I would have more sympathy for Apple if they behaved ethically, respecting developers and users. They absolutely do not behave ethically, preferring to exploit everything they can. Turnaround is a fair play, so I'm going to shed zero tears if Apple is forced to spend a couple hundred million dollars (at most) adapting their internal documentation for their APIs.

▲

SpicyLemonZest 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't understand the analogy. Are auto manufacturers in the EU required to publish a detailed spec and robust API for third party backup camera developers?

	▲	cyberax 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		They are required to provide detailed repair manuals, spare parts, and diagnostic software to independent repair shops.