▲ | metadat 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Why only 2x the ram? Wouldn't 96GB be even more optimum? Pretty awesome people went to the trouble to do this, casts some light on what is typically darkness on the consumer side of GPU product market segmentation. Capitalism wins every time. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | numpad0 a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Devices on a bus architecture like RAM buses can be wired completely parallel to the same pins on the same bus master(i.e. DRAM controller), with only one separate chip select lines each. The address/data lines will not conflict so long that the component expected to speak/listen can be explicitly specified(there are other ways to specify as well). GPU cores used in these double RAM NVIDIA GPUs are known to have that feature implemented and configurable in signed VBIOS, for some reasons. It only allows single or double RAM configurations as choices, not e.g. 4 separate lines for quadruple RAM, but double configurations can be done with a properly built and assembled PCB if you can source the cores. And there are tons of back alley trained skilled BGA repair specialists in China for mysterious reasons, so that's what they're doing. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | londons_explore 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I assume because you need to have a stolen firmware image to load on. Bet the ram size is a compile time constant and therefore you need to get hold of firmware from a card with the amount of ram you intend to add. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | adgjlsfhk1 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
space. there's a limited number of spots on the board for VRAM chips and a maximum capacity at current tech levels. |