▲ | AraceliHarker 4 days ago | |||||||
Even without directly visiting the YouTube site, it's impossible to avoid contact with YouTube because its videos are embedded everywhere. In that sense, YouTube's influence is extremely large. I feel that the FTC might have been better off trying to separate YouTube from Google rather than Chrome. The blog mentioned that the forced activation of Restricted Mode could have reduced video views, and while it's true that Restricted Mode blocks live streams, which could affect those who focus on live content, it basically doesn't block soft porn, violent videos, or political content. So, I don't think it's relevant. | ||||||||
▲ | bitpush 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> I feel that the FTC might have been better off trying to separate YouTube from Google rather than Chrome. On what joy? The biggest mistake that DoJ did was asking to court to divest Android & Chrome. Judge took grave offense at that (read the court's opinion) and there's a school of thought that said it distracted from the whole thing. Once you start being imprecise, all your arguments fall apart. | ||||||||
▲ | mercutio2 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I am so fascinated by the different worlds everyone lives in. I haven’t watched a video hosted on YouTube in years. But I hate amateur video. I never watch anything that I can possibly get through reading. So in my tiny corner of user space, it’s really as if YouTube doesn’t exist except as an annoying thing Google puts at the top of searches I have to scroll past, reminding me to configure this device to use a different search engine. | ||||||||
|