▲ | mcv 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Yeah, super thin phones that require bulky cases have never made sense to me. Why not make tough phones that don't require a case? | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | humpty-d 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Because if the case gets damaged you can easily replace it. People would still put a case on a bulky phone to protect resale or trade in value. A super thin phone doesn't require a super bulky case, it requires just as much case as a person would normally use, resulting in a smaller overall profile. I'd probably still go pro because I care more about the camera than the size. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | badc0ffee 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
They're sort of doing that with Ceramic Shield, and the new bumper case for the Air. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | jrockway 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I think the reality is that your phone will always encounter something that can damage it (unless it's made out of diamond), and a case lets you easily replace the damaged part. Just subjectively, I remember having a super scratched iPod and it just felt kind of ratty every time you looked at it. Meanwhile, a phone in a leather case gets kind of a patina that improves with age. It is kind of sad though, I got a really pretty blue iPhone and you wouldn't even know it because it's completely covered by a case. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | gensym 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Honestly, it sounds really compelling to me. I do a lot of stuff outside - search and rescue, climbing, etc, and I need a rugged case for that, but having a thin, light phone when I'm at home or doing something with less chance to damage the phone is pretty nice, so thin phone + case is the best of both worlds. |