Is this AI generated? Besides the em-dashes, I don't think anyone cites "Investopedia" as a source (not the specific entity, but in that format), or makes citations in (source, year) format.

▲

Apes 2 days ago | parent [-]

I created the list and had an LLM review it to ensure I wasn't just pulling stuff out of thin air. Looks like it switched my hyphens for em-dashes.

▲

kelipso 2 days ago | parent [-]

Isn’t it usually the opposite you are supposed to do? LLM output and make sure it is factual because LLMs cannot tell what is factual or not?

I can’t even get myself to read what you “wrote” because of the LLM tinge though lol.

▲

Apes 2 days ago | parent [-]

It seems odd that you're fixated on the tool used rather than the content itself. Do you refuse to wear clothes because a machine made them?

	▲	kentm 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Machines don’t typically make clothes that are not wearable. An LLM will produce content that is incorrect.
	▲	kelipso 2 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Because I don’t have to waste my valuable time and mental energy to check the knitting before I wear them. Hey I review and use LLM code slop as much as the next programmer, and I use it for lots of topics too, but I am not spending a second on reviewing LLM slop output on HN comments. Honestly it’s somewhat insulting that you expect me to.
	▲	kotaKat 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		No, I refuse to read arrogant slop that someone had to shove through a machine because they can’t think or write for themselves anymore.