Isn’t it usually the opposite you are supposed to do? LLM output and make sure it is factual because LLMs cannot tell what is factual or not?

I can’t even get myself to read what you “wrote” because of the LLM tinge though lol.

It seems odd that you're fixated on the tool used rather than the content itself. Do you refuse to wear clothes because a machine made them?

	▲	kentm 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Machines don’t typically make clothes that are not wearable. An LLM will produce content that is incorrect.
	▲	kelipso 2 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Because I don’t have to waste my valuable time and mental energy to check the knitting before I wear them. Hey I review and use LLM code slop as much as the next programmer, and I use it for lots of topics too, but I am not spending a second on reviewing LLM slop output on HN comments. Honestly it’s somewhat insulting that you expect me to.
	▲	kotaKat 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		No, I refuse to read arrogant slop that someone had to shove through a machine because they can’t think or write for themselves anymore.