Remix.run Logo
jalapenod 6 days ago

[flagged]

rimunroe 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

> Much of Wikipedia is pop culture, I wouldn’t call that knowledge.

Why?

bilekas 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Leaving out that your comment is opinionated and objectively wrong, pop culture is also knowledge.

MitPitt 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

All culture was once pop

6 days ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
01HNNWZ0MV43FF 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's handy to have a neutral place I can look up books or passages of the Christian Bible so that I have a reference point when talking to people about it

UncleSlacky 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/ exists.

BlueTemplar 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Isn't the issue with this is that you would first have to know which bible to use ?

spauldo 5 days ago | parent [-]

The differences between the translations are generally very minor. There are very few places where there is any significant difference in meaning.

LtWorf 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Honestly it's the first place I look when I must implement some network protocol.

freedomben 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

Network protocol stuff on Wikipedia has been top notch and my go-to since at least 2010. It really is highly underrated for that. I had to implement a layer 7 protocol on top of UDP back in the day, and it required a lot of understanding/fiddling with UDP and IP packet details to get it working right, and even required some router config (IP fragmentation became a huge problem, gotta love protocols designed by committee D-:)

jowea 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah, lots of the weaker parts of Wikipedia relate either to political controversy or things that the editor base doesn't care as much about.

mschuster91 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

yup. the amount of times I have looked up how to send an email over raw SMTP for troubleshooting...

mdp2021 6 days ago | parent [-]

...And on the contrary, I got deliria from an LLM in a similar area just hours ago.

This probably highlights how human contribution or automated referencing both have a root in the sources, that should be recovered as a focus. Part of the future of the presentation of information should be hyperlinking "to the book pages".

UtopiaPunk 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[citation needed]