▲ | account42 5 days ago | |||||||
Not if the cheese can be copied at no cost and there are already more cheese varieties around than anyone could eat in a lifetime. In that word, farmers should have no say in who does and doesn't get to eat cheese or extract a tax from cheese consumption. | ||||||||
▲ | AlecSchueler 5 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> there are already more cheese varieties around than anyone could eat in a lifetime. If that's what you think then why don't we just close down all the studios and instrument shops. We've got enough, no need to keep producing it? You can copy and distributed the cheese freely but the farmer still has to spend money taking care of and housing the cows, milking the cows, going through the whole processes of churning and pasteurising and everything else, then packaging it and disturbing it to where you can initially find it. Now after all that you come along and make your perfect atomic copy and walk away saying "Well screw you, you should have no say in any of this..." Then what? What's the incentive to produce and distribute new cheese? You really think it doesn't matter because you already have cheese from the past? Because there's a lot to be said about cheese that captures the spirit of the zeitgeist...(Ok that last bit didn't work in the metaphor) | ||||||||
|