> … reporters covering court cases… never seem to simply paste the link to the online PDF decision/ruling for us all to read, right in the story

This is an editorial decision and not something individual reporters get to decide. Headlines are the same.

▲

anticensor 2 days ago | parent [-]

It is also meant to lessen the legal burden: when they don't link to primary source, nobody can claim the is inaccurate, missing essential facts or made up.

	▲	jt2190 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		I can’t comment on this as I don’t know the case-law well, but I’m struggling to understand how citing but not linking to a source lessens the ability of anyone to make claims about accuracy, whether in a court of law or in the court of public opinion. Can you provide details?