▲ | blackqueeriroh 5 days ago | |||||||||||||
> Struggling with a problem creates expertise. Struggle is slow, and it's hard. Good developers welcome it. There is significant evidence that shows mixed results for struggle-based learning - it’s highly individualized and has to be calibrated carefully: https://consensus.app/search/challenge-based-learning-outcom... | ||||||||||||||
▲ | globnomulous 5 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
I don't particularly care what this, or any, LLM spits out, and given the pervasive problems that have bedeviled social-science research, I also don't care what the results show, let alone what they show on average. Anybody who has developed software should understand the value of struggling with a difficult problem. I'm obviously not talking about classroom exercises where the problem sets are expected to match a given skill level or cultivate a specific skill set, so the very idea of individualized, calibrated learning is irrelevant. As a teacher I'm also 100% uninterested in highly individualized, calibrated challenges for what I teach -- or for what I do professionally. The people who need those highly individualized, wildly different, more gently graduated increases in difficulty, for general problem solving or for the study of any area of programming or computer science, simply should not become engineers. | ||||||||||||||
|