▲ | clipsy 19 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> What we do have is the words of people saying they do not wish to die, but are taking MAID due to necessary supports not being offered instead. What percentage would you consider too high for that? What you do have is a handful of anecdotes, to put it in more honest terms. What's fascinating to me is that the discussion of these anecdotes revolves around wanting to eliminate MAID rather than -- gosh, I don't know -- offering those necessary supports instead? The anecdote (in the article) about it being easier for "some people" to get MAID than to get a wheelchair makes for a great soundbite, but the people who quote it always seem more interested in eliminating MAID than in providing wheelchairs to those in need, for some odd reason. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | giraffe_lady 19 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Well see I've been part of this conversation longer than maid has been a thing. And it used to be "oh that won't happen, it'll only be for terminally ill people and with a high level of medical and psychological oversight." And so my position was that maid shouldn't become a thing until eg "providing wheelchairs" is fully accomplished. And now here we are. Maid is a thing, and people are being encouraged to do it while not being provided the alternatives they are asking for. And the numbers for how many are totally illegible but also somehow too low for you to be concerned with. My activism has long been more focused on getting people the care they need than opposing maid. But regardless people still don't always get the care they need and we have maid for them instead. We said it would be like this and it is like this. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|