| ▲ | datadrivenangel 2 days ago |
| One thing to note about the modern 'betavoltaic' batteries is that they don't actually have more energy density than a standard 18650 lithium ion battery, but instead give off a much smaller amount of power for a decade or two, while an 18650 would probably have lost all it's chemical abilities. |
|
| ▲ | antonkochubey 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| I know this is an anecdote, but I have quite a few 18650's from early 2010's still in service, of course with significant increase to internal resistance and drop to capacity, but fully functional otherwise. |
| |
| ▲ | datadrivenangel 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I also have many functional 18650s of that age. lithium ion cells often self discharge at a few % per month, so after a few years of no power use a cell is likely to be dead without recharging anyways. The betavoltaics will still have usable power output. The real question is what the cost/performance comparison looks like between a betavoltaic system and a 18650 + tiny solar panel system that can on average recharge the battery on an annual basis. | |
| ▲ | buckle8017 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | He's talking decades without recharging. | | |
| ▲ | jolmg 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I think he's replying to the bit: > an 18650 would probably have lost all it's chemical abilities. |
| |
| ▲ | m463 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Wonder how early EVs with 18650s like the tesla roadster (2008) or model s (2013) are faring? |
|
|
| ▲ | deepnotderp 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| They do have higher energy density, it’s just a low power density |