And not corporate despite the lobbying?

Afaik not a single serious ngo support this.

It depends what you consider a “serious NGO,” but the NSPCC, the Molly Rose Foundation, the Breck Foundation, the End Violence Against Women Coalition, and other NGOs actively campaigned for and supported it.

	▲	arduanika 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Well sure, but no true NGO supports it.

▲

philipallstar 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Lobbying only does something if government is corrupt.

▲

cobbzilla 3 days ago | parent [-]

This is either a tautology or meaningless, depending on semantics.

Q: Are there today, or have there ever been in history, any non-corrupt governments (that by your implication are invulnerable to lobbying)?

I’m pretty sure lobbying is a thing everywhere, regardless of corruption. People want the government to do stuff and will try to make it happen, from autocracies to direct democracies and everything in between.

▲

philipallstar 3 days ago | parent [-]

Of course. Writing to your representative is you wanting the government to do something. There's nothing wrong with that. It's only when government is corrupt that it's a problem.

	▲	cobbzilla 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		So you’re saying “lobbying can do something, even when the government is not corrupt”? If so, then yes, that’s the point I was making, which refutes the statement that lobbying only does something if the government is corrupt. If not, then I’m confused, please help me understand what I’m missing.