> have never worked on games and it will take me quite a while (even months) to write a "basic" game.

You're contradicting yourself. I promise it wouldn't take you months, unless you're just a really bad developer.

What is the contradiction? I am guessing it will take me a non-significant effort to learn game mechanics and code them etc.

	▲	whoknowsidont 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		You've never worked on games yet you are exceedingly confident about your estimation or the difficulty involved. It's not that difficult to get a base level game up and running; ESPECIALLY with modern tooling.

▲

__loam 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Don't be a prick in public man, it looks bad

▲

whoknowsidont 3 days ago | parent [-]

I mean it's a simple fact that the baseline for creating a game, roughly using the average developer experience/capability, is not months. Making a _good_ game might take months, it often takes years.

And that's the part AI is not going to be able to help you with.

▲

3036e4 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Making a good boardgame, with zero need for programming, excluding artwork, is months or years of work. I would expect that much at a minimum for a (good) simple digital game, unless it is just going to sell on graphics and marketing alone (or luck).

▲

hcnews 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Maybe you are a games developer and are overlooking the fact that people have to first learn the basic apis/models/etc. of graphical systems, engines, etc. before using them. Not sure how you are saying that it wouldn't take a few weeks to code even a simple production game like chess or more complicated but still simple Jump king etc.

Just think of the speciality in which you aren't an expert, javascript/storage/networking ...

	▲	whoknowsidont 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		I've dabbled and continue to dabble in areas where I know nothing about. And in this case, there's nothing super special about making a game.