▲ | latexr 5 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> clearly written by an LLM, the long emdash was even present. Can we please stop propagating this accusation? Alright, sure, maybe LLMs overuse the em-dash, but it is a valid topographical mark which was in use way before LLMs and is even auto-inserted by default by popular software on popular operating systems—it is never sufficient on its own to identify LLM use (and yes, I just used it—multiple times—on purpose on 100% human-written text). Sincerily, Someone who enjoys and would like to be able to continue to use correct punctuation, but doesn’t judge those who don’t. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | ginko 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So do you always put in the ALT+<code> incantation to get an emdash or copy&paste? I feel the emdash is a tell because you have to go out of your way to use it on a computer keyboard. Something anyone other than the most dedicated punctuation geeks won't do for a random message on the internet. Things are different for typeset books. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | jascha_eng 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fact is that I maybe saw it in 10% of blogs and news articles before Chatgpt. And now it pops up in emails, slack messages, HN/reddit comments and probably more than half of blog posts? Yes it's not a guarantee but it is at least a very good signal that something was at least partially LLM written. It is also a very practical signal, there are a few other signs but none of them are this obvious. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|