| ▲ | jascha_eng 5 days ago | |
Fact is that I maybe saw it in 10% of blogs and news articles before Chatgpt. And now it pops up in emails, slack messages, HN/reddit comments and probably more than half of blog posts? Yes it's not a guarantee but it is at least a very good signal that something was at least partially LLM written. It is also a very practical signal, there are a few other signs but none of them are this obvious. | ||
| ▲ | latexr 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
> Fact is that I maybe saw it in 10% of blogs and news articles before Chatgpt. I believe you. But also be aware of the Frequency Illusion. The fact that someone mentions that as an LLM signal also makes you see it more. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion > Yes it's not a guarantee but it is at least a very good signal that something was at least partially LLM written. Which is perfectly congruent with what I said with emphasis: > it is never sufficient on its own to identify LLM use I have no quarrel with using it as one signal. My beef is when it’s used as the principal or sole signal. | ||
| ▲ | yoz-y 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Dubious. The only signal this gives that in aggregate people use AI. On individual basis, presence of em dashes means nothing. | ||
| ▲ | CRConrad 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> And now it pops up in emails, slack messages, HN/reddit comments and probably more than half of blog posts? Yeah, maybe that's the one thing people who didn't know how to do it before have learnt from "AI" output. | ||