That seems only like a temporary problem until people get used to actually stopping at red lights, as they are supposed to. After the initial acceptance phase, it should minimise accidents over the longer term.

▲

hammock 3 days ago | parent [-]

Unless there is a warning of how long is left on the yellow light, it’s an unsolvable problem because there is an asymmetric risk of stopping vs accelerating

▲

JumpCrisscross 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

> it’s an unsolvable problem because there is an asymmetric risk of stopping vs accelerating

This just sounds like everyone is speeding and/or distracted.

▲

ithkuil 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The lights should be designed so that if you don't have enough space to stop with a mild deceleration you should just go through. If a mild deceleration get you rear ended then of course that's an unsolvable problem

▲

hammock 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

No one wants to risk a ticket with a guess at how long the yellow is going to be, or whether they’ll make it thru or not. That is the unsolvable part. Yellows are inconsistent , and you aren’t accounting for slow-moving traffic ahead of you that might cause you to block the intersection, etc.

There was actually a scandal in Chicago were a study found that the city systematically reduced the length of yellows only on lights that had red light cameras in order to harvest tickets.

▲

tptacek 3 days ago | parent [-]

I feel like the subtext of all these concerns is that you'd need to drive very carefully to reliably avoid camera tickets... and nobody wants to drive that carefully. I get it, I don't either, and I do get occasional camera tickets. But like: I should also be driving more carefully.

	▲	hammock 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Slamming on the breaks because you’re anxious about a yellow light is not careful driving. But that’s what red light cameras do

▲

devilbunny 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Then they shorten the yellow so that it isn't "with a mild deceleration" but a full-on stomp-on-the-brakes stop.